United States of America v. $49,205.27 In United States Currency
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 15 Unopposed Motion to Continue the Date to File its complaint. Complaint deadline: 1/23/2012. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 8/19/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
Nevada Bar No. 2137
MICHAEL A. HUMPHREYS
Assistant United States Attorney
Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse
333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Suite 5000
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: (702) 388-6336
Facsimile: (702) 388-6787
E-mail: Michael.Humphreys@usdoj.gov
Counsel for the United States of America
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
$49,205.27 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY )
)
Defendant.
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
2:09-CV-1647-LRH (LRL)
UNITED STATES’ UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CONTINUE
THE DATE TO FILE ITS COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE IN
REM IN THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED MATTER AND ORDER
(Eighth Request)
17
18
The United States of America (“United States”), by and through Daniel G. Bogden, United
19
States Attorney, and Michael A. Humphreys, Assistant United States Attorney, respectfully applies
20
for an extension of time until and including January 23, 2012, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A),
21
for the United States to file a Civil Complaint for Forfeiture In Rem against the $49,205.27 in United
22
States Currency. The Government’s Complaint is currently due August 25, 2011.
23
Gregg Gariti and numerous associates of his have been the focus of a historical state/federal
24
criminal investigation into their activities of alleged unlawful gaming activities in Nevada and
25
elsewhere. Generally speaking, the Government has developed information that Gariti and others
26
were operating an illegal book-making operation from approximately December 2008 through
1
approximately April 2009, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1084 and other federal anti-gambling
2
statutes. A principal situs of that illegal operation was Las Vegas, Nevada.
3
4
Pursuant to plea negotiations between Mr. Gariti and the Government, on September 24,
2009, Mr. Gariti entered a change of plea before this Court.
5
In the meantime, the Government has a deadline, under the strictures of 18 U.S.C. § 983
6
(a)(3)(A), to file its forfeiture complaint, regarding the above-captioned currency, no later than August
7
25, 2011.
8
The criminal case will not be disposed of by the time the Government is required to file its
9
complaint. However, counsel for the United States believes that there will be a final disposition of
10
this matter before the expiration of the time period for the continuance requested herein; making
11
further requests for continuances unnecessary.
12
Finally, on August 18, 2011, defendant’s counsel, Margaret Stanish, agreed to the extension
13
of time and authorized counsel for the United States to file this Unopposed Motion with this Court.
14
Because the parties have agreed to the extension of time to file a Civil Complaint For Forfeiture In
15
Rem and to facilitate a final universal plea/sentencing disposition, this Court should extend the time.
16
This motion is not submitted solely for the purpose of delay or for any other improper
17
purpose.
18
...
19
...
20
...
21
...
22
...
23
...
24
...
25
...
26
...
2
1
WHEREFORE, the United States moves this Court to grant its motion to extend the time for
2
the United States to file its civil complaint in the above-captioned matter for an additional 150 days,
3
or until January 23, 2012.
4
DATED this 18h day of August, 2011.
5
Respectfully submitted,
6
DANIEL G. BOGDEN
United States Attorney
7
/s/Michael A. Humphreys
MICHAEL A. HUMPHREYS
Assistant United States Attorney
8
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED:
12
DATED this 19th day of August, 2011.
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15
DATED:
_______________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?