Nichols v. Clark County Detention Center et al

Filing 47

ORDER Denying 41 Motion for Expense Fund. FURTHER ORDERED that 42 Motion for Enlargement of Time is Granted. Dispositive Motions due no later than 3/26/2012. FURTHER ORDERED that 43 Motion to Appoint Counsel is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 2/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 10 11 12 COLBERT NICHOLS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ROBERT BANNISTER, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:09-cv-01698-LDG-GWF ORDER Motion for Expense Fund (#41) Motion for Enlargement of Time (#42) Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#43) 13 14 This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion for Expense Fund (#41), filed on 15 February 6, 2012; Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (#42), filed on February 6, 2012 and 16 Defendants’ Notice of Non-Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (#45), filed on 17 February 23, 2012; and Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#43), filed on February 6, 2012 18 and Defendants’s Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#46), filed on February 19 23, 2012. 20 I. Motion for Expense Fund (#41) 21 Plaintiff requests the Court order $3000.00 to be placed in Plaintiff’s account so he can hire an 22 MRI expert to testify as to his injuries. Plaintiff’s informa pauperis status allows him to proceed with 23 this action without payment of the original filing fee. It does not however obligate the Court to pay for 24 Plaintiff’s litigation expenses. Plaintiff’s request is therefore denied. 25 II. 26 Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (#42) Plaintiff requests an additional thirty day extension of the dispositive motion deadline, which is 27 currently February 10, 2012. (See #31.) Plaintiff claims that he did not receive all the discovery in a 28 timely manner. Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff’s request. The Court will extend the 1 dispositive motion deadline thirty days from the date of this order. Dispositive motions shall be filed 2 no later than Monday, March 26, 2012. 3 III. 4 Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#43) Plaintiff additionally requests the Court appoint him counsel to represent him in this matter. 5 Plaintiff claims that he cannot afford a lawyer, the issues of this litigation are complex, he is at a 6 disadvantage due to his incarceration, and all his attempts to secure a lawyer have been unsuccessful. 7 There is no constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in civil cases. Ivey v. Bd. of Regents of 8 Univ. of Alaska, 673 F.2d 266, 269 (9th Cir. 1982). In determining whether counsel should be 9 appointed, the court has discretion to consider the following factors: (1) the plaintiff’s financial 10 resources; (2) the efforts made by the plaintiff to secure counsel; and (3) the meritoriousness of the 11 plaintiff’s claim. Id. Plaintiff has not presented sufficient evidence to persuade this Court to appoint 12 counsel in this matter. Accordingly, 13 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Expense Fund (#41) is denied. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Enlargement of Time (#42) is 15 16 17 18 granted. Dispositive motions shall be due no later that Monday, March 26, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#43) is denied. DATED this 24th day of February, 2012. 19 20 21 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?