Valdez v. Cox Communications Las Vegas, Inc. et al

Filing 306

ORDER Granting 213 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Joseph Valdezs individual claim under the Fair Labor Standards Act remains pending. Granting 216 Motion to Sever and 217 Motion to Remand to State Court. Denying as moot 214 Motion for Judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/22/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 JOSEPH VALDEZ, 6 Plaintiff, 7 v. 8 9 10 COX COMMUNICATIONS LAS VEGAS, INC., et al., Defendants. *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:09-CV-01797-PMP-RJJ ORDER 11 12 IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Communications Services, Inc.’s Motion 13 for Partial Summary Judgment on Plaintiff’s Claim Under the Fair Labor Standards Act 14 (Doc. #213) is hereby GRANTED. However, Plaintiff Joseph Valdez’s individual claim 15 under the Fair Labor Standards Act remains pending. 16 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Joseph Valdez’s Motion to Sever 17 (Doc. #216) and Remand (Doc. #217) is hereby GRANTED. Plaintiff’s second and third 18 causes of action arising under Nevada state law are hereby SEVERED from the Amended 19 Complaint (Doc. #17) and REMANDED to the Eighth Judicial District Court in and for the 20 County of Clark, State of Nevada in Case No. A-09-597433-C. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Sierra Communications Services, 22 Inc.’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. #214) is hereby DENIED as moot, 23 without prejudice to renew in the remanded state court proceedings. 24 25 26 DATED: November 22, 2011 _______________________________ PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?