Salazar v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 61

FINAL JUDGMENT dismissing case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 7/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

i

ase 2: c 0182909- vLDG - F Document57- Fi 05/ 11 Page 1 of2
GW
8
l
ed 04/

1

FL 9
IE
E EZ
NT C D

2

C CEV
E IE
SF C 1
EWE
COON L RTE O RE RD
IS /A IS F C

3

4

JtL - 6 & 1
I
)

5

6
B
ï

CL RKd PIT I COLF
E S S FN IT
?
DIT C O NFI A
S iIT F
D
DP T
E Y

7

8

k

9

!
1û

'

l1
1
2

;

UN I
TED STATES DI
STRI CO URT
CT

1

DI
STRI OF N EV ADA
CT

1
3

1 AMBER S A/AR,nidvj lo
4 b
AL
a n iiua, n
l
1
5
.

CAS NO. 0 - 012 - GWF
E 2:9CV- 8 9LDG
CLA SS A CTI
ON

1
6

e alofhcs l,a onb hatofa1ot r
h f rel yd o l l he

pe s s m la l sm a e ,
r ons i l ry l t d
Pli if,
antfs

'

JUPGM ENT

V

17

1
8

W ELLS F
ARG O N. . a d D OES 1
A,n
t o
hr ugh 1 , i l s ve
00 nc u i ,

l
9

r
JUDG E :H ON .
LLO YD D . G EO RG E

De e nt .
f nda s

21
22

J
)

23

@
)

2
4

i
;

25

)
'

2
6

i

1

27
28
Z
UDOMENI
-

'

eAs 4 o74l
w 5 s,

!

'

(

;

a e2o -vo 8 9L s :9c-1 2 -DG GwF Do u n 5 - Fldo /4l p g 2o 2
c me t 78 i so /l a e f
e
.

I

1

W HEREAS, on December14,201 t sCour gr e pr i nar
0, hi
t antd elmi y
2 appr
ovalt a se tem entoft sac i
o
tl
hi ton;

!

j

3

W HEREAS t Cour gr led fnal
he
t ar i
t
>
a ovalt t s tl m enton June
ppr
o he e te
4 7 2û1l fndi t t s tl enti f r
i ng kat he e tem
s ai
,
,
.
,r
eas bl and adequat wibi t
ona e
e t n he
<
= m ea ng ofFe Rul Ci Pr 23( ) nda plc bl lw; n
ni
d. . v. oc
e a p ia e a ' d
a

r
.

.

i

;

i

6

W H EREA S,

7
8
9

teCo r h sfu dta ten tc sn t casme es
h u t a o n h th oie e to ls mb r

f ry a adequael i or
ail nd
t y nf med t Cl soft t msoft s tement w as
he as
he er
he etl
,
1

conssentwih F. C. 23 and duepr s and wasgi i t manner
it
t R. P.
oces ,
ven n he

E

pr s i byt Setl
e crbed
he tementAgr
eementa t Cour' Or nr i narl
nd he
ts der elmi iv
1
0
a r vi t e s tl men .
on o nc h e te t

1

r

11

Thi Cour her ent stnalJ
s
t eby er i udgmenti t sc , and di m i s i
n hi ase
s s es t

l
2

!
2

j wi prj c i a c d nc wiht tr o t Sete ntAg e me ta J nt
?
t eudie,n c or a e t he e ms f ke tlme
h
r e n nd oi
iulton Sete nts de a i ei na y
ova,
1 Stp ai ( tlme l Or rGrntngPrlmi r Appr land t Or r
4
he de
a tng n l pr va of a s to tlme ( na Appr lOr r
ova de)
1
5 Gr ni Fia Ap o l Cls Acin Sete nt Fi l

.
,

.

1
6
'

W ihoutafectng t fnalt oft sFi Judgmenti any wa , t
t
f i he i iy hi nal
n
y he

1 Co t e e v st e l i a c ntnungj iditonove t sa ton t nam ed
7
ur r s r e he xcusve nd o i i urs ci
r hi ci , he

k
.
!

1 Pl ntf,t Cl s,and t Def ntf pur esofs rvii t
8
ai if he as
he enda or pos
upe sng he
1 i ement i e or ent consr ton, and i er et i oft Setl
9 mpl
aton, nf cem ,
tuci
nt pr aton he tement
,

2 a alor r a dj dgme se ee i co eci t rwih.
0 nd l des n u
nt ntrd n nn ton hee t
21

I I SO ORD ERED .
T S

22
23

D at
ed:

,2011
,

2
4

(

25

I
-

,

26
.

2
7

IL Y D. EOR E. I
JJDOE OF THE

UNI sr TE DI YRIX couR'
TED ' s S C
r

28

.

t

;
'
.

b

k )J
4) UDGME
U

2-

(V-93 8 cw
2 0 -1 9

E - 4 9 7 4.1
/514 6 6 8
$

.: