Jones v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al

Filing 173

ORDER Denying 167 Motion to Vacate the Show Cause Order as a Final Judgment Has Been Entered. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/22/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

9

IMAN JONES, an individual,

10

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

LAS VEGAS METROPOLITAN POLICE
DEPARTMENT, a political subdivision of
Clark County, Nevada; G. CROSSMAN,
individually and in his official capacity as a
Police Officer with the Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department; D.
ROSEQUIST, individually and in his official
capacity as a Police Officer with the Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department; J. GIESE,
individually and in his official capacity as a
Police Officer with the Las Vegas
Metropolitan Police Department; AZ
SEARCH AND RECOVERY, LLC, an
Arizona limited liability company; JOSHUA
SIMS, an individual; JUSTIN GOODEN, an
individual; FINEX CAPITAL GROUP, LLC
d/b/a LOANEX, a Nevada limited liability
company; POLICE OFFICER DOES 1
through 10, inclusive; INDIVIDUAL DOES 1
through 10, inclusive; and ROE
CORPORATIONS 1 through 10, inclusive,

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

Defendants.

2:09-CV-01874-LRH-RJJ
ORDER

24
25
26

Before the court is Plaintiff Iman Jones’ “Petition to Vacate the Show Cause Order as a
Final Judgment Has Been Entered.” Doc. #167.

1

Final judgment was indeed entered in this matter on May 29, 2012, following the court’s

2

grant of summary judgment to certain defendants and Plaintiff’s stipulation to voluntarily dismiss

3

the remaining defendants. See Doc. #166. There is no “Show Cause Order” currently pending,

4

however, and Plaintiff fails to identify the order to which his motion is directed. To the extent

5

Plaintiff’s motion to vacate may be directed at the court’s Minute Order of May 17, 2012, directing

6

the remaining parties to comply with Local Rule 16-3 and file a proposed joint pretrial order by

7

June 1, 2012, see Doc. #163, that requirement was rendered moot by the dismissal of the remaining

8

defendants and the entry of final judgment. Plaintiff’s motion to vacate the order is therefore

9

unnecessary.

10
11

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Petition to Vacate the Show Cause Order as
a Final Judgment Has Been Entered (#167) is DENIED.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

DATED this 22nd day of June, 2012.

14
15
__________________________________
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

2