Nugent-Davi v. Clark County et al

Filing 100

ORDER for the Filing of a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 7/23/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8
9
10
11
12

CINDY NUGENT-DAVI,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, et. al.,
)
)
Defendant.
)
__________________________________________)

Case No. 2:09-cv-01921-LRH-GWF
ORDER

13
14

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Response to Order and Plaintiff’s Request to

15

Stay Joint Pretrial Order (#99), filed on June 4, 2012. On May 2, 2012, the Court ordered Plaintiff to

16

initiate a meet and confer with Defendants and file a joint pretrial order no later than June 1, 2012. In

17

response to that order, Plaintiff states that she attempted to contact Defendants, but was unable to reach

18

them. Plaintiff now requests the Court stay the filing of the joint pretrial order for a period of 180 days

19

in light of several personal issues Plaintiff is dealing with.

20

While the Court recognizes the number of issues Plaintiff is currently facing, the Court will not

21

stay the filing of the joint pretrial order for 180 days. Giving Plaintiff the benefit of the doubt, the

22

Court will grant Plaintiff a 45 day extension of time to file the joint pretrial order. The Court reminds

23

Plaintiff that pursuant to Local Rule 16-3(c), it is Plaintiff’s responsibility to initiate the meet and

24

confer to discuss the filing of the joint pretrial order. The Court will order that a copy of Local Rule 16

25

be sent to Plaintiff, to assist her in drafting the joint pretrial order. The Court directs Plaintiff to Local

26

Rule 16-4, which outlines the form Plaintiff should follow in drafting the joint pretrial order. The Court

27

also instructs Defendants to cooperate and work with Plaintiff in drafting and filing the joint pretrial

28

order.

1

This will be the last extension of time the Court will grant regarding the filing of the joint

2

pretrial order. Failure to file the joint pretrial order by the date below will result in the imposition of

3

sanctions up to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint be dismissed

4

for Plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. Accordingly,

5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully

6

complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than Monday, July 23, 2012.

7

DATED this 6th day of June, 2012.

8
9
10

______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2