Jimenez v. Warden et al
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss. The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/13/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 DATED: September 13, 2010. vs. WARDEN, et al., Respondents. ALBERTO JIMENEZ, Petitioner, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
2: 09-cv-01949-PMP-PAL ORDER
This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which Petitioner, a state prisoner, is represented by counsel. Pending before the Court is Respondents' motion to dismiss. (Docket #8.) Respondents filed their motion to dismiss on March 3, 2010. (Docket #8.) It is accompanied by proof of service on Petitioner. Petitioner has not opposed or otherwise responded to the motion. Rule 7-2 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada provides in part, "[t]he failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion." Accordingly, the Court finds that Petitioner's failure to respond to Respondents' motion constitutes consent to the granting of the motion. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Respondents' motion to dismiss is GRANTED. (Docket #8.) The clerk shall enter judgment accordingly.
PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?