Kemp v. Skolnik et al

Filing 69

ORDER Denying 62 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff must file a response to 65 MOTION to Dismiss by 4/24/2012. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/9/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7

***

8

KEITH KEMP,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

vs.

12

HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al.,

13

Defendants.
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:09-CV-02002-PMP-LRL

ORDER

15

Having read and considered Plaintiff’s Motion for District Judge to

16

Reconsider Order (Doc. #62) filed March 2, 2012, and Defendants’ Response in

17

Opposition thereto (Doc. #63) filed March 16, 2012, and good cause appearing,

18
19
20

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for District Judge to Reconsider
Order (Doc. #62) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the deadline by which Plaintiff Kemp

21

must file a response to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #65) is hereby

22

extended to and including April 24, 2012.

23

DATED: April 9, 2012.

24
25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge