Kemp v. Skolnik et al

Filing 70

ORDER Granting 65 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/26/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7

KEITH KEMP,
Plaintiff,

8
9
10

vs.

11

HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al.,

12

Defendants.
13
14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

2:09-CV-02002-PMP-VCF

ORDER

On April 9, 2012, the Court entered an Order (Doc. #69) denying Plaintiff’s

15

Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #62) and directing that Plaintiff file a response to

16

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. #65) not later than April 24, 2012. To date,

17

Plaintiff has failed to comply with this Court’s Order. As a result, Plaintiff consents

18

to the granting of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. Moreover, a review of

19

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss shows that Defendants are entitled to the relief

20

requested on the merits.

21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc.

22

#65) is GRANTED and that the Clerk of Court shall forthwith enter judgment in

23

favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff.

24

DATED: April 26, 2012.

25
26

PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge