Hackett v. Feeney et al
Filing
159
ORDER Denying 157 Motion for Expedited Oral Argument on Outstanding Motions. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 9/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
***
4
SANDY HACKETT,
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
RICHARD FEENEY, an individual; ARTHUR )
PETRIE, an individual; TRP
)
ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Nevada limited )
liability company, PLAYLV GAMING
)
OPERATIONS, LLC d/b/a PLAZA HOTEL
)
AND CASINO, a Nevada limited liability
)
corporation, BROADWAY BOOKING OFFICE )
NYC, LTD, a New York corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
)
TRP ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Nevada
)
limited liability company,
)
)
Counterclaimant,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SANDY HACKETT, an individual,
)
)
Counterdefendant.
)
_______________________________________)
)
TRP ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Nevada
)
limited liability company,
)
)
Third Party Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
THE HACKETT MILLER COMPANY, INC., a )
Nevada Corporation,
)
)
Third Party Defendant. )
_______________________________________)
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)
1
Case No.: 2:09-cv-02075-RLH-LRL
ORDER
(Motion for Expedited Oral
Argument–#157)
1
Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Oral Argument on
2
Outstanding Motions (#157, filed Sept. 2, 2011). Contemporaneously with this order, the Court
3
has filed its order on the motions described in Defendants’ motion and on other motions.
4
Therefore, this motion is denied as moot as the motions are no longer outstanding.
5
Accordingly, and for good cause appearing,
6
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Oral Argument
7
8
on Outstanding Motions (#157) is DENIED.
Dated: September 8, 2011.
9
10
____________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
United States District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?