Hackett v. Feeney et al

Filing 159

ORDER Denying 157 Motion for Expedited Oral Argument on Outstanding Motions. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 9/8/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 SANDY HACKETT, 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) RICHARD FEENEY, an individual; ARTHUR ) PETRIE, an individual; TRP ) ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Nevada limited ) liability company, PLAYLV GAMING ) OPERATIONS, LLC d/b/a PLAZA HOTEL ) AND CASINO, a Nevada limited liability ) corporation, BROADWAY BOOKING OFFICE ) NYC, LTD, a New York corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) ) TRP ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Nevada ) limited liability company, ) ) Counterclaimant, ) ) vs. ) ) SANDY HACKETT, an individual, ) ) Counterdefendant. ) _______________________________________) ) TRP ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, a Nevada ) limited liability company, ) ) Third Party Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) THE HACKETT MILLER COMPANY, INC., a ) Nevada Corporation, ) ) Third Party Defendant. ) _______________________________________) 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 1 Case No.: 2:09-cv-02075-RLH-LRL ORDER (Motion for Expedited Oral Argument–#157) 1 Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Oral Argument on 2 Outstanding Motions (#157, filed Sept. 2, 2011). Contemporaneously with this order, the Court 3 has filed its order on the motions described in Defendants’ motion and on other motions. 4 Therefore, this motion is denied as moot as the motions are no longer outstanding. 5 Accordingly, and for good cause appearing, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Expedited Oral Argument 7 8 on Outstanding Motions (#157) is DENIED. Dated: September 8, 2011. 9 10 ____________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?