Niemeyer v. Ford Motor Company et al

Filing 218

JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant Ford Motor Company and against Plaintiffs Jessica Niemeyer, Kathryn Niemeyer, Mark Niemeyer, and Rebecca Niemeyer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/20/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
Case 2:09-cv-02091-JCM-PAL Document 217 1 2 J 4 5 6 7 Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 3 Daniel S. Rodman Nevada Bar No. 8239 Jay J. Schuttert Nevada Bar No. 8656 Joshua D. Cools Nevada Bar No. Il94l SNELL & WILMER r-.1.p. 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Telephone: (702) 784-5200 Facsimile: (702) 784-5252 Email drodman@swlaw.com Email jschuttert@swlaw.com Email icools@swlaw.com 8 9 Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY 10 11 Ò o lr c.) É lla ;o UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA t2 lo t4 iEv ,z fo ¡ _,: t5 É U) Plaintiffs, 13 CASE NO. 2:09-ov-2091-JCM-PAL JUDGMENT IN A CIVI ACTION FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY I qE C) KATHRYN A. NIEMEYER, et al., VS. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, !> ãg l= E t6 Defendant. I7 18 This action was tried by a jury with the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan presiding. A t9 jury of eight persons was regularly empanelled on the 29th day of 20 action; witnesses on behalf of the plaintifß and the defendant were sworn and examined; and 2T exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant. October , 2012, to hear said 22 After hearing the evidence, the instructions of the Court, and the arguments of counsel, the 23 jury retired to consider its findings and subsequently returned on the 7th day of November,2012, 24 with a unanimous verdict in favor of Defendant Ford Motor Company and against Plaintiffs 25 Kathryn A. Niemeyer, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Anthony Niemeyer, 26 Mark Niemeyer, Jessica Niemeyer, and Rebecca Niemeyer, Pursuant to this special verdict, the 27 jury found that the 2007 Ford Focus's driver's airbag system was not defective. 28 Case 2:09-cv-02091-JCM-PAL Document 217 Filed 11/19/12 Page 2 of 3 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs recover nothing, the action be dismissed 2 on the merits, and Defendant Ford Motor Company recover costs from Plaintiffs as provided by J law. 4 DATED 20th this day ofNovember, 2012. 5 By 6 7 District Court Judge James C. Mahan Prepared and Submitted by: SNELL & WILMER r.r.p. 8 9 10 S. Rodman Bar No. 8239 11 t2 lr¡ E I I i^ Êlõô ;ô 13 3 lì;ge 15 CJ Ht *- I ril-3 I4 F iËriì ,., j ö såÈ TliÌ UDI i Jay J. Schuttert Nevada Bar No, 8656 Joshua D. Cools Nevada Bar No. lI94I 3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100 Las Vegas, NV 89169 Attorneys for Defendant FORD MOTOR COMPANY I6 T7 18 T9 20 2I 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- Case 2:09-cv-02091-JCM-PAL Document 217 Filed 11/19/12 Page 3 of 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am over the age of 2 I am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date, I J (18) years, and 4 served 5 FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY by the method indicated below: 6 XXXXX CMÆCF Federal Express 7 XXXXX U.S. Mail Electronic Service 8 U.S. Certified Mail Hand Delivery 9 Facsimile Transmissron Overnight Mail Ralph J. Rohay, Esq. 309 W. Lake Mead Pkwy., Ste. B Las Vegas, NV 89015 Telephone: (7 02) 7 37 -1122 Facsimile: (702) 737 -3110 Attorneys for Plaintiffs ?12 Ë* 13 *i¡ Bradley D. Kuhlman, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Chad C. Lucas, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Kuhlman & Lucas, LLC 1100 Main St., Suite 2550 Kansas City, MO 64105 Telephone: (816) 799-0330 Facsimile: (816) 799-0336 Attorneys for Plaintifß t4 ,z fo iz? -() H U) ;Be 15 r) l= är :E 16 p'17 3 18 Daniel T. Ryan, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice) Law Office of Daniel T. Ryan, LLC 1717 ParkAvenue St. Louis, MO 63104 Telephone : (3 I 4) 222-7 7 17 Facsimile : (3 I 4) 932-2688 Attorneys for Plaintiffs I9 20 DATED thi"nf,day of November, 2012. 2t 22 L.L.P 23 24 25 26 27 28 -J- to be ACTION and addressed to the following 11 tr Ë tlo lo caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing JUDGMENT IN A CM 10 lr () eighteen

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?