Niemeyer v. Ford Motor Company et al
Filing
218
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant Ford Motor Company and against Plaintiffs Jessica Niemeyer, Kathryn Niemeyer, Mark Niemeyer, and Rebecca Niemeyer. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 11/20/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
Case 2:09-cv-02091-JCM-PAL Document 217
1
2
J
4
5
6
7
Filed 11/19/12 Page 1 of 3
Daniel S. Rodman
Nevada Bar No. 8239
Jay J. Schuttert
Nevada Bar No. 8656
Joshua D. Cools
Nevada Bar No. Il94l
SNELL & WILMER
r-.1.p.
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Telephone: (702) 784-5200
Facsimile: (702) 784-5252
Email drodman@swlaw.com
Email jschuttert@swlaw.com
Email icools@swlaw.com
8
9
Attorneys for Defendant
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
10
11
Ò
o
lr
c.)
É
lla ;o
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
t2
lo
t4
iEv
,z fo ¡ _,: t5
É
U)
Plaintiffs,
13
CASE NO. 2:09-ov-2091-JCM-PAL
JUDGMENT IN A CIVI ACTION
FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY
I
qE
C)
KATHRYN A. NIEMEYER, et al.,
VS.
FORD MOTOR COMPANY,
!>
ãg
l= E
t6
Defendant.
I7
18
This action was tried by
a
jury with the Honorable Judge James C. Mahan presiding. A
t9
jury of eight persons was regularly empanelled on the 29th day of
20
action; witnesses on behalf of the plaintifß and the defendant were sworn and examined; and
2T
exhibits were offered and admitted by the Court on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant.
October
,
2012, to hear said
22
After hearing the evidence, the instructions of the Court, and the arguments of counsel, the
23
jury retired to consider its findings and subsequently returned on the 7th day of November,2012,
24
with a unanimous verdict in favor of Defendant Ford Motor Company and against Plaintiffs
25
Kathryn A. Niemeyer, Individually and as the Representative of the Estate of Anthony Niemeyer,
26
Mark Niemeyer, Jessica Niemeyer, and Rebecca Niemeyer, Pursuant to this special verdict, the
27
jury found that the 2007 Ford Focus's driver's airbag system was not defective.
28
Case 2:09-cv-02091-JCM-PAL Document 217
Filed 11/19/12 Page 2 of 3
1
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT Plaintiffs recover nothing, the action be dismissed
2
on the merits, and Defendant Ford Motor Company recover costs from Plaintiffs as provided by
J
law.
4
DATED
20th
this
day ofNovember, 2012.
5
By
6
7
District Court Judge James C. Mahan
Prepared and Submitted by:
SNELL & WILMER r.r.p.
8
9
10
S. Rodman
Bar No. 8239
11
t2
lr¡
E
I
I
i^
Êlõô
;ô
13
3 lì;ge
15
CJ
Ht
*- I ril-3 I4
F iËriì
,., j ö såÈ
TliÌ
UDI i
Jay J. Schuttert
Nevada Bar No, 8656
Joshua D. Cools
Nevada Bar No. lI94I
3883 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 1100
Las Vegas, NV 89169
Attorneys for Defendant
FORD MOTOR COMPANY
I6
T7
18
T9
20
2I
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Case 2:09-cv-02091-JCM-PAL Document 217
Filed 11/19/12 Page 3 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I
I, the undersigned, declare under penalty of perjury, that I am over the age of
2
I
am not a party to, nor interested in, this action. On this date,
I
J
(18) years, and
4
served
5
FOLLOWING TRIAL BY JURY by the method indicated below:
6
XXXXX
CMÆCF
Federal Express
7
XXXXX
U.S. Mail
Electronic Service
8
U.S. Certified Mail
Hand Delivery
9
Facsimile Transmissron
Overnight Mail
Ralph J. Rohay, Esq.
309 W. Lake Mead Pkwy., Ste. B
Las Vegas, NV 89015
Telephone: (7 02) 7 37 -1122
Facsimile: (702) 737 -3110
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
?12
Ë* 13
*i¡
Bradley D. Kuhlman, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Chad C. Lucas, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Kuhlman & Lucas, LLC
1100 Main St., Suite 2550
Kansas City, MO 64105
Telephone: (816) 799-0330
Facsimile: (816) 799-0336
Attorneys for Plaintifß
t4
,z fo iz?
-()
H
U)
;Be 15
r)
l= är
:E
16
p'17
3
18
Daniel T. Ryan, Esq. (Pro Hac Vice)
Law Office of Daniel T. Ryan, LLC
1717 ParkAvenue
St. Louis, MO 63104
Telephone : (3 I 4) 222-7 7 17
Facsimile : (3 I 4) 932-2688
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
I9
20
DATED thi"nf,day of November, 2012.
2t
22
L.L.P
23
24
25
26
27
28
-J-
to
be
ACTION
and addressed to the following
11
tr
Ë tlo
lo
caused
a true and correct copy of the foregoing JUDGMENT IN A CM
10
lr
()
eighteen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?