Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Ryska et al
Filing
27
DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. and against moreaffordable4u.com, Angelika Ryska and, Robert Mayer. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 3/18/2011. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc. v. Ryska et al
Doc. 27
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The Court having granted Plaintiff's Motion for Final Judgement and Permanent Injunction by Default (#25), therefore, THE COURT ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that Defendants Angelika Ryska a/k/a Angelica Ryska and Robert Mayer, individually and d/b/a moreaffordable4u.com shall pay Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc., statutory damages of $1,000,000.00, which represents an award of $100,000.00 for each of ten trademarks counterfeited by the Defendants in accordance with 15 U.S.C. §1117(c)(2); THE COURT FURTHER PERMANENTLY ENJOINS AND RESTRAINS Defendants Angelika Ryska a/k/a Angelica Ryska and Robert Mayer, individually and d/b/a moreaffordable4u.com, their agents, servants, employees, and all persons acting under v. ANGELIKA RYSKA, et al., Defendants. ROLEX WATCH U.S.A., INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:09-cv-2093-LDG (RJJ) FINAL JUDGMENT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION BY DEFAULT
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26
Defendants' permission and authority from infringing, in any manner, Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.'s trademarks in accordance with 15 U.S.C. §1116; THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS AND ADJUDGES that Defendants Angelika Ryska a/k/a Angelica Ryska and Robert Mayer, individually and d/b/a moreaffordable4u.com pay Plaintiff Rolex Watch U.S.A., Inc.'s costs, including reasonable attorney's fees, in accordance with 15 U.S.C. §1117(a) and (b).
DATED this ______ day of March, 2011.
Lloyd D. George United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?