McEwen v. Accelerated Commercial Consultants et al

Filing 187

ORDER that the $1,000 sanction against Defendant Ulbright, as ordered on 9/26/12 (#177) is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 6 7 8 9 2:09-cv-02173-PMP-VCF JULIE MCEWEN, Plaintiff, MINUTE ORDER vs. 10 ACCELERATED COMMERCIAL 11 CONSULTANTS, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 14 Before the Court is Julie McEwen v. Accelerated Consultants, case no. 2:09-cv-02173-PMP- 15 VCF. The Court held a status hearing on October 15, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. Defendant Frank Ulbright did 16 not appear in person or as ordered, telephonically. 17 On September 26, 2012, the Court found that defendant Frank Ulbright is in criminal contempt 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(e) and is sanctioned $1,000.00 for failing to comply with court orders. The 19 check was to be deposited with the Court on or before October 9, 2012. (#177). 20 scheduled a status hearing for October 15, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. and Defendant Ulbright was ordered to 21 appear telephonically. Id. On October 12, 2012, Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (#172) was 22 granted and the Clerk of Court entered a Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Frank 23 Ulbright and Terry Pritchett. (#182 and #183). On October 15, 2012, the Clerk of Court entered an 24 Amended Judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Ulbright and Pritchett in the amount of 25 $4,178,137.24. In light of the Amended Judgment, entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants Ulbright and Pritchett in the amount of $4,178,137.24, The Court also 1 2 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the $1,000 sanction against Defendant Ulbright, as ordered on September 26, 2012 (#177), is VACATED. DATED this 16th day of October, 2012. _________________________ CAM FERENBACH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?