Pacific Coast Steel et al v. Leany et al

Filing 519

ORDER Granting 512 Plaintiffs' Motion for a Charging Order Against Member's Interest. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 PACIFIC COAST STEEL, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 Case No. 2:09-CV-02190-KJD-PAL TAMRA MAE L. HUNT, et al., 14 ORDER Defendants. 15 16 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for a Charging Order Against Member’s 17 Interest (#512). Defendants filed a response in opposition (#513) to which Plaintiffs replied (#514). 18 Having read and considered Plaintiffs’ motion and the opposition, and good cause being found, the 19 Court grants the motion. 20 Pursuant to Nevada Revised Statute 86.401, the Court charges the membership interests of 21 Tamra Mae L. Hunt, personally, and Tamra Mae L. Hunt as trustee of the Tamra Mae L. Hunt 22 Irrevocable Trust ("Tamra Mae L. Hunt") in SOUTHERN UTAH WATER STUDY LLC, HUNT 23 AVIATION LLC, THE GRAND LODGE INVESTMENTS LLC, THE GRAND LODGE BRIAN 24 HEAD LLC, 320 WEST UTAH AVENUE LLC, CENTURY PROPERTIES HENDERSON 18 25 LLC, TAMWATT LLC,2504 FESTIVE COURT LLC, BACKDRAFT LLC, TRISM III LLC, 26 BRIANHEAD 201 LLC, THE FAMILY LEANY LLC, TRISM T RANCH LLC, INVESTMENT 1 PILLARS LLC and 600 N. AIRPORT ROAD LLC with payment of the unsatisfied amount of the 2 judgment of $18,357,630.17 with interest as provided by NRS 86.401. 3 It is further ordered that all payments, disbursements, or other income due or provided to 4 Tamra Mae L. Hunt personally or to Tamra Mae L. Hunt as trustee of the Tamra Mae L. Hunt 5 Irrevocable Trust be paid to Pacific Coast Steel and San Diego Steel Holdings Group, Inc. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED this 11th day of September 2014. 8 9 10 11 _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?