Clark v. Thomas

Filing 40

ORDER for the Filing of a Stipulated Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by 10/24/2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 10/12/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
8

MICHAEL E. CLARK,

9

Plaintiff,

10

vs.

11

JOHN THOMAS,

12

Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 2:09-cv-2272-GMN-GWF
ORDER

13
14

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a proposed Stipulated

15

Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Counsel for Defendant removed this matter to federal court

16

on November 30, 2009 and an Amended Complaint was filed August 19, 2010. Defendant filed

17

his Answer (#36) on August 22, 2011. Pursuant to LR 26-1, the parties were required to meet

18

and/or confer as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) within 30 days after the first defendant answered

19

or otherwise appeared, and 14 days thereafter to file a mandatory stipulated discovery plan and

20

scheduling order. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly,

21

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall file a stipulated Discovery Plan and

22

Scheduling Order not later than October 24, 2011 in compliance with the provisions of LR 26-1 of

23

the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

24

DATED this 12th day of October, 2011.

25
26
27
28

_______________________________________
GEORGE FOLEY, JR.
United States Magistrate Judge