Clark v. Thomas

Filing 92

ORDER that parties shall file a Proposed Joint Pretrial Order by 11/15/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 MICHAEL E. CLARK, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 JOHN THOMAS, 12 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:09-cv-2272-GMN-GWF ORDER 13 14 This matter is before the Court on the parties’ failure to file a joint pretrial order required by 15 LR 26-1(e)(5). Order (#44) setting the discovery plan required the parties to file a joint pretrial 16 order required by LR 26-1(e)(5) no later than April 30, 2012, or 30 days after a decision on the 17 dispositive motions. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (#55) and Defendant’s motion for 18 summary judgment (#69) were decided on September 28, 2012, in which case the date for filing the 19 Joint Pretrial Order was suspended until 30 days after the decision. There are no further dispositive 20 motions pending. To date, the parties have not complied. Accordingly, 21 IT IS ORDERED that 22 1. Counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies 23 with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than November 15, 24 2012. Failure to timely comply will result in the imposition of sanctions up 25 to and including a recommendation to the District Judge that the complaint 26 be dismissed for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 27 ... 28 ... 1 2 3 2. The disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) and any objections thereto shall be included in the pretrial order. DATED this 5th day of November, 2012. 4 5 6 ______________________________________ GEORGE FOLEY, JR. United States Magistrate Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?