Roberts v. Cox et al

Filing 64

ORDER Denying 60 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

DISTRICT OF NEVADA
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

4
KEN ROBERTS,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
JAMES GREG COX, et al.,
8
Defendants.
9
10
11

2:09-cv-02382-PMP -VCF
ORDER

Before the court are pro se plaintiff Ken Roberts’ Motion To Strike (#60) and Notice of Motion
(#61). Defendants filed an Opposition on January 27, 2012. (#62).

12

In plaintiff’s motion (#60), he asks this court to “strike defendants[’] document #54 as being a

13

duplicate [of] defendant[s’] document #53.” Document #53 is defendants’ response to plaintiff’s

14

motion for declaratory judgment (#52). Document #54 is simply a corrected image filed in order to

15

amend the date of Certificate of Service to reflect the date the document was actually served. (#54).

16

Therefore, striking the corrected image (#54) is not warranted.

17

Accordingly, and for good cause shown,

18

IT IS ORDERED that pro se plaintiff Ken Roberts’ Motion To Strike (#60) is DENIED.

19

DATED this 31st day of January, 2012.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26

CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE