Souza v. United States of America

Filing 23

ORDER that plaintiff shall pay initial filing fee of $224.23 by 11/22/2010. Failure to do so may result in a recommendation to the District Judge that the case be dismissed. See order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 10/25/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS, 2 copies of order to plaintiff, cc: Acctg Suprv FCI Victorville)

Download PDF
Souza v. United States of America Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On July 8, 2010, Plaintiff filed an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Dkt. #13), along with a Notice of Appeal (Dkt. #14) concerning the court's Order (Dkt. #11) denying Plaintiff's Motion for Clarification of Amendment I of the Constitution of the United States. The court approved Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and entered a payment Order (Dkt. #17) concerning Plaintiff's appeal. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed Plaintiff's appeal, finding the court lacked jurisdiction over Plaintiff's Notice of Appeal. See Order of USCA, Dkt. #20. The court finds that Plaintiff also qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis before this court. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1), Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee. Id. Even if this action is dismissed, the full filing fee must still be paid pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). Plaintiff shall have thirty days from the date this Order is entered in which to have the designated fees sent to the Clerk of Court. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this action. An initial partial payment of $224.23 is assessed pursuant to Section 1915(b)(1). Upon payment of that initial partial filing fee, Plaintiff will be obligated to make monthly payments of twenty percent of the preceding month's income credited to his trust account. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The agency having custody of Plaintiff shall forward payments from Plaintiff's account to the Clerk of the Court for /// MARTIN SOUZA, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. ) __________________________________________) Case No. 2:09-cv-02392-GMN-PAL ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 the United States District Court for the District of Nevada each time the amount in the account exceeds $10.00 until the filing fee is paid. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The Clerk of Court shall provide the Plaintiff with two copies of this Order. Plaintiff is ordered to make the necessary arrangements to have one copy of this Order attached to the check in the amount of the designated fee by sending a copy of the Order with an Inmate Money Release form for the amount of the initial installment payment to the Inmate Accounts/Commissary Department of FCI-Victorville. Plaintiff shall have until November 22, 2010, in which to make the first payment. Failure to do so may result in a recommendation to the District Judge that the case be dismissed. 2. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915, as amended by the Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada an initial payment of $224.23 for this action within thirty days of the date of this Order. Failure to comply will result in the recommendation of dismissal of this action. 2. Subsequently, Plaintiff shall pay to the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada twenty percent of the preceding month's deposits to the prisoner's account (in months that the account exceeds $10.00) until the full $350.00 filing fee has been paid for this action. 3. The Clerk shall send a copy of this order to the Accounting Supervisor at FCIVictorville, PO Box 5300, Adelanto, CA 92301. Dated this 25th day of October, 2010. ________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?