Beaver v. Johnson et al
Filing
25
ORDER Denying 19 Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are permitted one week from the date of this Order to file a reply to their Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 8/31/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
***
8
9
10
11
12
WILLIAM SHELDON BEAVER,
)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
MARSHAL B. JOHNSON, et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
____________________________________)
2:09-cv-2415-RLH-RJJ
ORDER
(Motion to Strike–#19)
13
14
Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion for Summary
15
Judgment for Failure to Comply with FRCP 5.2 (#19, filed March 29, 2011). The failure in question
16
has to do with the improper disclosure of birth date and Social Security numbers in exhibits filed in
17
support of Defendants’ Motion.
18
Inasmuch as the Court has granted Defendants’ Motion to Seal the exhibits in
19
question, the violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 has been adequately rectified and the
20
Motion to Strike is moot.
21
It appears that the Court’s delay in addressing the Motion to Strike may have delayed
22
or precluded the filing of a reply in support of Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
23
Accordingly, the Court will grant Defendants one week from the date of this Order to file any reply in
24
support of their Motion for Summary Judgment.
25
26
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Strike Defendants’ Motion
for Summary Judgment for Failure to Comply with FRCP 5.2 (#19) is DENIED.
1
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants are permitted one week from the date of
this Order to file a reply to their Motion for Summary Judgment.
Dated: August 31, 2011.
4
5
____________________________________
Roger L. Hunt
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?