Pacquiao v. Mayweather, Jr. et al

Filing 143

ORDER Denying 131 Motion for Default Judgment and Denying 132 Motion to Dismiss and Granting 133 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 10/18/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 14 *** ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 15 Before the court are plaintiff Emmanuel Pacquiao’s (“Pacquiao”) motion for default 9 EMMANUEL PACQUIAO, a Philippines resident, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 FLOYD MAYWEATHER, JR.; et al., 13 Defendants. 2:09-cv-2448-LRH-RJJ ORDER 16 judgment (Doc. #1311); motion to dismiss counterclaims (Doc. #132); and motion for attorney’s 17 fees (Doc. #133) related to defendant Floyd Mayweather, Jr.’s (“Mayweather, Jr.”) failure to attend 18 his scheduled deposition. 19 I. 20 Facts and Background Plaintiff Pacquiao is a premier professional boxer from the Philippines. In mid-2009, 21 Pacquiao and non-moving defendant Floyd Mayweather, Jr. (“Mayweather, Jr.”), another premier 22 professional boxer, entered into fight negotiations for a late 2009, Las Vegas, Nevada boxing 23 match. Eventually, negotiations broke down between the parties and the fight was not scheduled. 24 Subsequently, beginning in September 2009, Pacquiao alleges that Mayweather, Jr. stated 25 26 1 Refers to the court’s docket number. 1 publicly that Pacquiao has used, and is using, performance enhancing drugs (“PEDs”), including 2 steroids and human growth hormone (“HGH”). On December 30, 2009, Pacquiao filed a complaint 3 in federal court for defamation against Mayweather, Jr. Doc. #1. 4 During discovery, Pacquiao scheduled Mayweather, Jr.’s deposition. Mayweather, Jr. filed a 5 motion for a protective order to preclude the deposition (Doc. #122) which was denied by the 6 magistrate judge (Doc. #124) and affirmed by this court (Doc. #129). Despite the denial of his 7 motion for a protective order, Mayweather, Jr. failed to attend his scheduled deposition. Thereafter, 8 Pacquiao filed the present motions for various sanctions. Doc. ##131, 132, 133. 9 II. Discussion 10 Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides in pertinent part that the court, in 11 its discretion, may issue sanctions against a party for that party’s failure to attend a deposition. See 12 FED . R. CIV . P. 37(b)(1) and (b)(2)(A). Here, it is undisputed that Mayweather, Jr. failed to attend 13 his deposition even after he was ordered to appear by the court. Thus, the issue before the court is 14 whether and what kind of sanctions are appropriate under this circumstance. 15 In his motions, Pacquiao contends that the appropriate sanctions are (1) dismissal of 16 Mayweather, Jr.’s answer and counterclaims, (2) entering default judgment in favor of Pacquiao, 17 (3) and awarding attorney’s fees. See Doc. ##131, 132, 133. 18 In determining an appropriate sanction for failure to comply with a discovery order or attend 19 a scheduled deposition, the court examines five factors: (1) the public’s interest in the expeditious 20 resolution of litigation; (2) the court’s need to manage its docket; (3) the risk of prejudice to non- 21 offending party; (4) the public policy favoring disposition of cases on the merits; and 22 (5) availability of less drastic sanctions. See Leion v. IDX Sys. Corp., 464 F.3d 951, 958 (9th Cir. 23 2006). In reviewing these factors, the court makes two important findings. First, there has been no 24 prior order from this court involving the issuance of sanctions against Mayweather, Jr. This is the 25 first time the court is addressing Mayweather, Jr.’s failure to comply with a discovery request and 26 2 1 court order. As such, this factor weighs against Pacquiao’s request for case ending sanctions 2 because less severe sanctions are still available to the court to curb Mayweather, Jr.’s improper 3 behavior. Second, the court finds that Pacquiao has failed to establish any prejudice that would 4 result from not issuing such drastic sanctions. Discovery in this action has not concluded and will 5 not conclude until early 2012, providing the parties another opportunity to schedule the deposition. 6 Therefore, the court finds that Pacquiao’s requested sanctions dismissing Mayweather, Jr.’s 7 counterclaims and entering default judgment are inappropriate. However, any further failures by 8 Mayweather, Jr. may invite such severe sanctions. 9 Notwithstanding the above, the court does find that monetary sanctions related to the cost of 10 the deposition, as well as attorney’s fees relating to that deposition and the present motion are 11 appropriate in light of Mayweather, Jr.’s failure to comply with a court order and attend his 12 deposition. Accordingly, the court shall grant Pacquiao ten (10) days to file a motion for attorney’s 13 fees that complies with LR 54-16. 14 15 16 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for default judgment (Doc. #131) and motion to dismiss counterclaims (Doc. #132) are DENIED. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees (Doc. #133) is 18 GRANTED. Plaintiff Emmanuel Pacquiao shall have ten (10) days from entry of this order to 19 submit a motion for attorney’s fees which complies with LR 54-16. 20 DATED this 18th day of October, 2011. 21 22 23 __________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 24 25 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?