Pacquiao v. Mayweather, Jr. et al
Filing
234
ORDER that 191 Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in support of Opposition to Mayweather's Motion to Compel Discovery and For Sanctions; and 192 Sealed Motion are GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 9/13/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
EMMANUEL PACQUIAO,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
FLOYD MAYWEATHER, JR. et al.,
13
Defendant,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:09-cv-2448-LRH-RJJ
ORDER
14
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff Pacquiao’s Motion for Leave to File a Sur15
Reply in Support of Opposition to Mayweather’s Motion to Compel Discovery and For Sanctions
16
(#191) and Plaintiff Pacquiao’s Sealed Motion (#192).
17
Plaintiff seeks Court approval to file a sur-reply to Defendant’s Reply (#184/185)
18
regarding Defendants’ Motion to Compel (#161). Pacquiao argues that the Defendants’ Reply
19
(#185) introduced new facts and issues that were not in the original Motion (#161) and that most
20
of the new information arose after the Response (#176). The Court agrees. The Sur-Reply will be
21
helpful in evaluating the Motion to Compel (#161). Good cause appearing therefore,
22
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Pacquiao’s Motion for Leave to File a Sur23
Reply in Support of Opposition to Mayweather’s Motion to Compel Discovery and For Sanctions
24
(#191) and Plaintiff Pacquiao’s Sealed Motion (#192) are GRANTED.
25
DATED this 13th
day of September, 2012.
26
27
28
ROBERT J. JOHNSTON
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?