Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Pixcir Microelectronics Co. Ltd

Filing 53

ORDER Granting 52 Motion to File Under Seal. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/24/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

SEAN P. DEBRUINE (admitted pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, California 94025
Telephone:
650-838-2000
Facsimile:
650-838-2001
ROBERT J. CALDWELL (Bar No. 007637)
[e-mail]
MATTHEW J. CHRISTIAN (Bar No. 008024)
[e-mail]
E. DANIEL KIDD (Bar No. 010106)
[e-mail]
KOLESAR & LEATHAM, CHTD.
400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

15
16
17

ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,

18
v.

19
20

Case No. 2:10-cv-00014-GMN-(PAL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
ORDER GRANTING
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION’S MOTION TO FILE
UNDER SEAL

PIXCIR MICROELECTRONICS CO. LTD.,
Defendant.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ELAN’S MOTION
Order Granting Elan's Motion to Seal TO 1
SEAL

Case No. 2:10-cv-00014 GMN-(PAL)

1

The Court has received plaintiff Elan Microelectronics Corporation’s Motion to File Under

2

Seal, filed on October 21, 2011. Good cause appearing, Elan’s motion is hereby GRANTED. It is

3

hereby ORDERED that the following documents may be filed under seal:
1.

4
5

Ltd.’s (“Pixcir’s”) Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.
2.

6
7

Elan Microelectronics Corporation’s Opposition to Pixcir Microelectronics Co.

[Proposed] Order Denying Pixcir’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss for Lack of

Personal Jurisdiction.

8

3.

Elan’s Motion for Sanctions for Pixcir’s Abuse of the Judicial Process.

9

4.

Declaration of Sean P. DeBruine in Support of Elan’s (1) Opposition to Pixcir’s

10

Renewed Motion to Dismiss, (2) Motion for Sanctions for Abuse of the Judicial Process, and (3)

11

Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Provide Discovery.
5.

12

Exhibits G-O to the Declaration of Sean P. DeBruine in Support of Elan’s (1)

13

Opposition to Pixcir’s Renewed Motion to Dismiss, (2) Motion for Sanctions for Abuse of the

14

Judicial Process, and (3) Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Provide Discovery.

15

IT IS SO ORDERED this 24th day of October, 2011.

16

IT IS SO ORDERED this ____ day of ____________, 2011.

17

________________________________
_______________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
Peggy A. Leen
United States District JudgeJudge
United States Magistrate

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ELAN’S MOTION
Order Granting Elan's Motion to Seal TO
SEAL

1
2

Case No. 2:10-cv-00014 GMN-(PAL)

1

Respectfully submitted,

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

By:

/s/ Sean P. DeBruine
Robert J. Caldwell, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 7637
KOLESAR & LEATHAM, CHTD.
Matthew J. Christian, Esq.
Nevada Bar No. 8024
400 South Rampart Boulevard, Suite 400
Las Vegas, Nevada 89145
and
Sean P. DeBruine, Esq.
Admitted Pro Hac Vice
ALSTON & BIRD, LLP
275 Middlefield Road, Suite 150
Menlo Park, California 94025

Attorneys for Plaintiff
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS CORPORATION

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ELAN’S MOTION
Order Granting Elan's Motion to Seal TO
SEAL

2
3

Case No. 2:10-cv-00014 GMN-(PAL)