Moore v. Calderone et al
ORDER Denying 31 Defendants' Motion to Strike 29 Order for Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties have to and including 10/29/10 to comply with 29 Order for Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 10/15/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 *** 8 ROGER MOORE, 9 Plaintiff, 10 vs. 11 C/O ALLEN, et al., 12 Defendant, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ROBERT J. JOHNSTON United States Magistrate Judge ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:10-cv-0034-PMP-RJJ
This matter was referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge on Defendants' Motion to Strike Order Requiring Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#31). The Court having reviewed the Motion (#31) and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Strike Order Requiring Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order (#31) is DENIED. The parties are authorized to pursue discovery on the remaining claims and will do so according to an approved discovery schedule. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties have to and including October 29, 2010, to comply with the Court's Order (#29). DATED this 15th Day of October, 2010.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?