Cottle et al v. Gillispie et al
Filing
78
ORDER that plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 70 is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/7/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
SEAN COTTLE, et al.,
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
DOUG GILLESPIE, et al.,
13
Case No. 2:10-CV-00271-JCM-(PAL)
Defendants.
ORDER
14
15
Presently before the court is pro se plaintiff Sean Cottle's motion to reconsider this court's
16
order granting in part and denying in part defendants' motions to dismiss. (Doc. #70). Defendants
17
Douglas Gillespie, Clark County Detention Center and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
18
have responded (doc. #74) and plaintiff has replied (doc. 75).
19
This court entered its order (doc. #69) on July 6, 2011. On July 18, 2011, plaintiff filed the
20
instant motion to reconsider the July 6, 2011, order. On July 25, 2011, prior to this court’s ruling on
21
the motion to reconsider, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, seeking review of the July 6, 2011, order
22
by the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
23
Plaintiff's appeal has divested this court of jurisdiction to reconsider the July 6, 2011, order.
24
See Mayweathers v. Newland, 258 F.3d 930, 935 (9th Cir. 2001) (once a notice of appeal is filed
25
“jurisdiction over the matter being appealed normally transfers from the district court to the appeals
26
court.”); see also Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982) (per curiam)
27
(“The filing of a notice of appeal . . . confers jurisdiction on the court of appeals and divests the
28
district court of its control over those aspects of the case involved in the appeal.”).
1
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that plaintiff's
2
motion for reconsideration (doc. #70) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED without prejudice.
3
DATED September 7, 2011.
4
5
_________________________________
JAMES C. MAHAN
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?