Scales v. Johnston et al

Filing 5

ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 3 Report and Recommendation that Plaintiffs Complaint be dismissed, is hereby AFFIRMED, ACCEPTED and ADOPTED. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 5/25/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Before this Court is the Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (#3, filed April 28, 2010), entered by the Honorable Peggy A. Leen, regarding Plaintiff's Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (#1), and Judge Leen's screening of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). No objection was filed to Magistrate Judge Leen's Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge in accordance with Local Rule IB 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and the matter was submitted for consideration. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-2 and determines that the Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Leen should be affirmed, accepted and adopted. //// //// 1 ANNIE M. SCALES, ) ) Plaintiff(s), ) ) vs. ) ) JUDGE ROBERT JOHNSTON, et al., ) ) Defendant(s). ) ____________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA *** 2:10-cv-0329-RLH-PAL ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen's Order and Report of Findings and Recommendation (#3, entered April 28, 2010) is AFFIRMED, ACCEPTED and ADOPTED, and Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed. Dated: May 25, 2010. _________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief U.S. District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?