Righthaven LLC v. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws

Filing 37

ORDER DISMISSING CASE re 36 Joint Stipulation of Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 7/9/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Righthaven LLC v. National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws

Doc. 37

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6656 [e-mail] J. CHARLES COONS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10553 [e-mail] Righthaven LLC 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR THE REFORM OF MARIJUANA LAWS, a District of Columbia domestic nonprofit corporation; MEDIA AWARENESS PROJECT (MAP), INC., a Delaware nonprofit corporation, Defendants.

Case No.: 2:10-cv-0351-LDG-PAL JOINT STIPULATION OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

Plaintiff, Righthaven LLC ("Righthaven") and Media Awareness Project (MAP), Inc. ("MAP"; collectively with Righthaven known herein as the "Parties"), by and through counsels of record, pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, hereby stipulate to a voluntary dismissal of all claims asserted against Defendant, MAP, with prejudice, in the abovecaptioned matter.

1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1

Specifically, Righthaven requests voluntary dismissal with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Rule 41(a)(2) permits voluntary dismissal with prejudice "by court order, on terms that the court considers proper1." On or about June 4, 2010, the Parties entered into a settlement agreement (the "Agreement"), whereby MAP shall be released from all claims of copyright infringement in the above-entitled matter, upon full compliance with the terms of the Agreement. Righthaven further specifically requests that this Court retain jurisdiction of this matter, subsequent to dismissal, in order to enforce the terms of the Agreement. WHEREFORE, the Parties request this Court enter an Order dismissing MAP from the above-captioned matter with prejudice. WHEREFORE, the Parties further request this Court retain jurisdiction of the abovecaptioned matter to enforce the terms of the Agreement. DATED this thirtieth day of June, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: ______________________________

Submitted by: RIGHTHAVEN LLC /s/ J. Charles Coons J. Charles Coons, Esq. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Attorney for Plaintiff RIDDER, COSTA & JOHNSTONE LLP /s/ Chris K. Ridder Chris K. Ridder, Esq. 12 Geary Street, Suite 701 San Francisco, California 94108 Attorney for Defendant

Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

2