Woori America Bank v. Sahara Westwood Hotel, LLC et al

Filing 30

ORDER REGARDING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. The Report and Recommendation is AFFIRMED in part as to the order to obtain counsel. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/6/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
-PAL Woori America Bank v. Sahara Westwood Hotel, LLC et al Doc. 30 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Presently before the Court is the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#24) of Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen recommending that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed unless Plaintiff retained counsel who files a Notice of Appearance with the Local Rules before January 25, 2011. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and LR IB 3-2. Plaintiff's original counsel had his motion to withdraw granted (#21), but then filed a motion for summary judgment on January 31, 2011. Counsel then filed Notice of Appearance in accordance with the Local Rules on February 8, 2011. The Court finds that the Findings and Recommendation (#24) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered January 13, 2011, should be affirmed in part and denied in part as moot. v. SAHARA WESTWOOD HOTEL, et al., Defendants. WOORI AMERICAN BANK, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-CV-00358-KJD-PAL ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff having belatedly retained counsel and filed Notice of Appearance of Counsel, IT IS ORDERED that the Report of Findings and Recommendation (#24) of the United States Magistrate Judge entered January 13, 2011, is AFFIRMED in part as to the order to obtain counsel. DATED this 6th day of April 2011. _____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?