Bally Technologies, Inc. v. Business Intelligence Systems Solutions, Inc.

Filing 173

ORDER ON JUDGMENT. The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of Defendant Business Intelligence Systems Solutions, Inc. and against Plaintiff Bally Technologies, Inc. on count one of Plaintiffs Complaint. The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgme nt in favor of Plaintiff Bally Technologies, Inc. and against Defendant Business Intelligence Systems Solutions, Inc. on Defendants seventh (tortious interference with prospective economic advantage) and eighth (defamation) counterclaims. The Clerk o f Court shall dismiss Defendants first, second, and third (non-infringement) counterclaims. The Clerk of Court dismiss Defendants fourth, fifth, and sixth (invalidity) counterclaims. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/23/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 *** ) BALLY TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, ) ) v. ) ) BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS ) SOLUTIONS, INC., ) ) Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff. ) ) 12 13 2:10-CV-00440-PMP-GWF ORDER ON JUDGMENT The Court having this date entered Orders granting and denying summary judgment, and entirely resolving all remaining claims in the above action, 14 IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter Judgment in favor of Defendant 15 Business Intelligence Systems Solutions, Inc. and against Plaintiff Bally Technologies, Inc. 16 on count one of Plaintiff’s Complaint. 17 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court enter Judgment in favor of 18 Plaintiff Bally Technologies, Inc. and against Defendant Business Intelligence Systems 19 Solutions, Inc. on Defendant’s seventh (tortious interference with prospective economic 20 advantage) and eighth (defamation) counterclaims. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court dismiss Defendant’s first, 22 second, and third (non-infringement) counterclaims. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 1 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court dismiss Defendant’s fourth, fifth, and sixth (invalidity) counterclaims. 3 4 DATED: August 23, 2012 5 _______________________________ 6 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?