Copper Sands Homeowners Association, Inc. et al v. Copper Sands Realty, LLC et al

Filing 514

ORDER granting 495 Motion for Good Faith Settlement Except as to Irwin Mortgage Corporation. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. terminated. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 6/25/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 6 ARIEL E. STERN Nevada Bar No. 8276 STEVEN G. SHEVORSKI Nevada Bar No. 8256 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP 1160 Town Center Drive, Suite 330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 Telephone: (702) 634-5000 Facsimile: (702) 380-8572 Email: ariel.stern@akerman.com Email: steven.shevorski@akerman.com 7 Attorneys for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 2 3 4 5 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 COPPER SANDS HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., a Nevada non-profit corporation; MARCIA JARRETT; CHARLES WOOD; RICHARD DRESSLER; RICHARD EMANUEL; PAUL DOYLE; ARLENE MARENTIC; BOJAN NENADIC; EVERETT F. CROXSON; MYRA SCHULTZ; STEVEN GAZZA; MILORAD JAGROVIC; DAVID G. FERGUSON; JANE SOO HOO LUI; ZUI YI QIU; DORON GERBY; CATALIN NISTOR; and HILARY GARBER, on their own behalf and on behalf of all others similarly situated; and POE HOMEOWNERS 1 through 2000, 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER GRANTING PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC.'S MOTION FOR GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT, EXCEPT AS TO IRWIN MORTGAGE CORPORATION Plaintiffs, 18 19 Case No. 2:10-cv-00510-GMN-RJJ vs. COPPER SANDS REALTY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; ROBERT COLUCCI, an individual; DARIO DELUCA, an individual, a/k/a DARIO DE LUCA; CBC INVESTMENTS, INC., a Nevada corporation; JIM CERRONE, an individual; COMPLEX SOLUTIONS, LIMITED, a Nevada limited liability company; COPPER SANDS INVESTORS LP, a Nevada limited partnership; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS, INC., a New York corporation; CS CONSULTING SERVICE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; TERESA CUSHMAN, an individual; RENATO DELUCA, a/k/a RAY DELUCA and RAY DE LUCA; DFT, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a THE CANYON MANAGEMENT COMPANY; SHAWN HEYL, an individual; LYNDA HOANG, an individual; IRWIN MORTGAGE CORPORATION, an {24414992;1} 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Indiana corporation; BRENT JONES, an individual, BRENT JONES SERVICES, INC., a Nevada corporation; MANIETTA ELECTRIC, INC., a California corporation; MORTGAGE LOAN SPECIALISTS, INC., a California corporation; PACIFICA ENTERPRISES HOLDINGS LP, a California limited partnership; PACIFICA ENTERPRISES, INC., a California corporation; PACIFICA ENTERPRISES LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; PACIFICA MARKETING SERVICES, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company d/b/a "CONDO CLUB", "CONDO CLUB LAS VEGAS", and "CONDO CLUB – LAS VEGAS", PACIFICA REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS, INC., a California corporation; PACIFICA REAL ESTATE SERVICES, INC., a California corporation; PLASTER DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC., a Nevada corporation, d/b/a "SIGNATURE HOMES" and "SIGNATURE HOMES, INC.", PREMIER COMMUNITIES, INC., a Nevada corporation; PREMIER FINANCIAL, LLC, a California limited liability company; PREMIER REALTY SERVICES, INC., a California corporation; PREMIER RESIDENTIAL, INC., a California corporation; VIMARK RE ENTERPRISES, LLC, a California limited liability company, DOES 1 through 100, inclusive; ROE CORPORATIONS 1 through 100; ROE BUSINESS ENTITIES 1 through 100, inclusive; and ROE GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES 1 through 20, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 The Court grants Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.'s (CHL) motion for good faith settlement 20 (See Doc #495) pursuant to NEV. REV. STAT. §17.245 and Local Rule 7-2(d). Any and all putative 21 claims against CHL for contribution or equitable indemnity are extinguished, except as to Irwin 22 Mortgage Corporation.1 23 I. 24 ARGUMENT SUMMARY 25 CHL and plaintiffs reached a settlement agreement. CHL agreed to pay plaintiffs jointly the 26 sum of $65,000. Plaintiffs agreed to the release of all known and unknown claims and causes of 27 28 1 Irwin Mortgage Corporation provided notice of its Chapter 11 bankruptcy as reflected in Case # 2:11-bk-57191 in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. (See Doc #259, Notice of Bankruptcy). {24414992;1} 2 1 action that Plaintiffs have or may have had against CHL. Plaintiffs will execute and file a stipulation 2 of dismissal with prejudice of their claims and causes of action against CHL. The parties' agreement 3 and release was reached after an arms-length negotiation. CHL and plaintiffs were represented by 4 counsel. 5 A. The amount paid in settlement is sufficient. 6 CHL has agreed to pay $65,000 in exchange for a full settlement and release and stipulation to 7 dismiss all of plaintiffs' claims and causes of action against CHL with prejudice. CHL did not 8 originate the majority of the plaintiffs’ loans. Still more plaintiffs’ claims fail because they sold their 9 homes through short sales or allowed them to be foreclosed upon. On March 9, 2012, the Court 10 struck all of the HOA's representative allegations from the Third-Amended Complaint on March 9, 11 2012. (See Doc #388 at 7:9-11). 12 Plaintiffs' damages against CHL are speculative. Plaintiffs suggest that CHL is responsible 13 because of the decline in property value of their homes. CHL is not responsible for the decline in 14 property values due to the global economic downturn generally and the real estate market crash in Las 15 Vegas, Nevada in particular. Plaintiffs have not disclosed any out-of-pocket loss proximately caused 16 by their reliance on alleged inaccurate appraisals. All of plaintiffs’ claimed damages are speculative 17 and wholly unsupported by the evidence or cognizable legal theories. 18 represents a balance of risk from the parties' claims and defenses. The good faith nature of the 19 settlement is patent. 20 B. The parties’ settlement Allocation of the settlement proceeds among plaintiffs is evidence of good faith. 21 Plaintiffs have agreed to a lump sum payment for future allocation. A collective payment is 22 therefore appropriate as plaintiffs are in the best position to determine a fair and equitable distribution 23 amongst themselves. 24 C. CHL has no insurance policy applicable to this case. 25 CHL does not have insurance coverage to offset the costs and potential risk of damages of 26 plaintiffs' allegations in the Complaint. The settlement amount paid by CHL therefore is a significant 27 payment because it comes from CHL itself and not an insurer. 28 {24414992;1} 3 1 D. There is no collusion, fraud, or tortious conduct aimed at non-settling defendants. 2 The parties settled this matter after participating in a settlement conference with Magistrate 3 Judge Foley and after extensive telephonic negotiations over several days. The parties' settlement was 4 made in good faith as a result of an arms-length negotiation where both CHL and plaintiffs were 5 represented by counsel. 6 E. No defendant has opposed CHL's motion for good faith settlement. 7 CHL filed its motion for good faith settlement on May 30, 2012. (See Doc #495). Responses 8 to CHL's motion for good faith settlement were due on June 16, 2012. CHL's motion for good faith 9 settlement should be granted pursuant to LR 7-2(d). See LR 7-2(d) ("The failure of an opposing party 10 to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the 11 motion."). 12 F. Irwin Mortgage Corporation Carve-Out. 13 Irwin Mortgage Corporation provided notice of its Chapter 11 bankruptcy as reflected in Case 14 # 2:11-bk-57191 in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. 15 (See Doc #259, Notice of Bankruptcy). CHL agrees this Court's determination of good faith is not an 16 adjudication of any rights or interests of Irwin and has no binding or preclusive effect on Irwin. CHL 17 reserves its rights to file a later motion for a de novo determination of good faith settlement and 18 application of NEV. REV. STAT. §17.245 as to Irwin should it seek to assert claims or causes of action 19 against CHL. CHL agrees that Irwin's right to oppose any such motion is specifically reserved. 20 II. 21 FINDINGS AND ORDER 22 First, the Court concludes the automatic stay of litigation due to Irwin Mortgage Corporation's 23 bankruptcy precludes application of a determination of good faith settlement and Nev. Rev. Stat. 24 §17.245 to Irwin Mortgage Corporation. CHL reserves its rights to file a later motion for a de novo 25 determination of good faith settlement and application of NEV. REV. STAT. §17.245 as to Irwin should 26 it seek to assert claims or causes of action against CHL. CHL agrees that Irwin's right to oppose any 27 such motion is specifically reserved. 28 Second, the Court considered the factors described in In re MGM Grand Litigation, 570 {24414992;1} 4 1 F.Supp. 913 (D. Nev. 1983). The Court finds the sum of $65,000 to be fair and sufficient. The Court 2 finds there is no evidence of collusion between CHL and plaintiffs. The Court finds there is no 3 evidence of an intent by CHL to injure the non-settling defendants' interests by CHL's settlement with 4 plaintiffs. The Court finds, subject to the Irwin Mortgage Corporation carve-out, no timely opposition 5 has been filed to CHL's motion for good faith settlement. The failure to file an opposition to a motion 6 is consent to the granting of the same. L.R. 7-2(d). 7 8 9 Third, the Court orders, subject to the carve-out for Irwin Mortgage Corporation, CHL and plaintiffs' settlement is in good faith pursuant to NEV. REV. STAT. §17.245. IT IS SO ORDERED this______of day of June, 2012. IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th June, 2012 10 ________________________________ _________________________________ The Honorable Gloria M. NavarroGloria M. Navarro United States District Court United States District Judge Judge 11 12 13 Respectfully submitted by: 14 AKERMAN SENTERFITT LLP 15 19 /s/ Steven G. Shevorski ARIEL E STERN Nevada Bar No. 8276 STEVEN G. SHEVORSKI Nevada Bar No. 8256 1160 Town Center Drive Suite 330 Las Vegas, Nevada 89144 20 Attorneys for Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. 16 17 18 _ 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 {24414992;1} 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?