Copper Sands Homeowners Association, Inc. et al v. Copper Sands Realty, LLC et al

Filing 645

ORDER that Plaintiffs are to file their Response to 643 Renewed Motion to Set Aside Plaintiff's Assertion of Attorney-Client Privilege by 11/1/2013. Failure to do so may result in the Court finding the renewed motion to be unopposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

15

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

16

On October 21, 2013, the Court issued an order setting a briefing schedule for Defendant’s

10

COPPER SANDS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,

11
Plaintiff(s),
12
vs.
13
COPPER SANDS REALTY, LLC, et al.,
14
Defendant(s).

Case No. 2:10-cv-00510-GMN-NJK
ORDER RE: DOCKET NO. 643

17

filing of a renewed motion to set aside Plaintiffs’ assertion of privilege. Docket No. 640. As part of

18

that order, the Court indicated that “Plaintiffs shall file a response to that renewed motion, no later

19

than October 29, 2013.” Id. at 2. Although Defendant filed its renewed motion, Docket No. 643,

20

Plaintiffs failed to timely file a response in accordance with the Court’s order.1 Plaintiffs are hereby

21

ORDERED to file their response no later than noon on November 1, 2013. The failure to do so

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The Court recognizes that the electronic filing system automatically generated a response date
to the renewed motion of November 10, 2013. See Docket No. 643. “The notice automatically
generated when a party electronically files a motion is not a court order” and does not alter deadlines set
by Court order. Carrillo v. B&J Enterps., LLC, 2013 U.S. Dist. Lexis 22010, *2 (D. Nev. Feb. 19,
2013). Accordingly, Plaintiffs have violated the Court’s order requiring a responsive brief be filed no
later than October 29, 2013. Nonetheless, the Court will allow a short extension to the deadline. See id.
at *3. The Court expects counsel to abide by Court ordered deadlines in the future, however.

1

may result in the Court finding the renewed motion to be unopposed. See Local Rule 7-2(d).

2

Defendant shall file a reply no later than November 6, 2013.

3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

DATED: October 30, 2013

5
6

______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2