Copper Sands Homeowners Association, Inc. et al v. Copper Sands Realty, LLC et al
Filing
700
ORDER Granting 678 Defendant Cannon Management's Motion to Strike Section 18 from Jan Brussel's 5/27/2011, expert report. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
COPPER SANDS HOMEOWNERS
ASSOCIATION, INC., et al.,
9
Plaintiff(s),
10
vs.
11
COPPER SANDS REALTY, LLC,
12
Defendant(s).
13
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 2:10-cv-00510-GMN-NJK
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
STRIKE
(Docket No. 678)
14
Pending before the Court is Defendant Cannon Management’s motion to strike. Docket No. 678.
15
The Court finds the motion properly decided without oral argument. See Local Rule 78-2. Defendant
16
argues that Jan Brussel’s May 27, 2011, expert report improperly includes $1,621,193.54 in electrical
17
costs. See id. at 5 (discussing Section 18). Plaintiffs responded to the motion by indicating that they
18
do not intend to seek those damages from Defendant and agree that electrical items can be removed from
19
the report. Docket No. 691 at 2. As Plaintiffs do not dispute the relief sought, the Court hereby
20
GRANTS the motion to strike Section 18 from Jan Brussel’s May 27, 2011, expert report.1
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED: June 4, 2014
23
______________________________________
NANCY J. KOPPE
United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiffs sought leave to substitute the objectionable report with a new one that removes
Section 18. See Docket No. 691 at 2-3. Defendant objects to the substitute report on the grounds that it
removes Section 18 but also includes new information. See Docket No. 697. The Court declines to
expend judicial resources on such a dispute. The Court has ordered that Section 18 must be stricken,
which is all that is properly before the Court. The parties must comply with that order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?