Olin Corporation et al v. Continental Casualty Company et al
Filing
250
ORDER Granting 248 Motion File Documents Under Seal in Support of 245 MOTION in Limine to Exclude or Limit the Testimony of Plaintiffs' Expert Burl Daniel (exhibits to be filed under seal). Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/23/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
RAINBOW CORPORATE CENTER
777 NORTH RAINBOW BLVD., STE. 225
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89107
FACSIMILE: 702-384-6025
TELEPHONE: 702-889-6400
HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC
9
10
11
JONQUIL WHITEHEAD, ESQ.
Nevada Bar No.: 10783
HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC
777 N. Rainbow Blvd., Ste. 225
Las Vegas, NV 89107
(702) 889-6400- Office
(702) 384-6025 – Facsimile
jwhitehead@hpslaw.com
PETER E. KANARIS (Pro Hac Vice)
DAVID E. HEISS (Pro Hac Vice)
MEGAN E. RITENOUR (Pro Hac Vice)
FISHER KANARIS, P.C.
200 South Wacker Drive, 22nd Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Tel: (312) 474-1400
Fax:(312) 474-1410
Attorneys for Defendants
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
13
14
15
Case No.: 2:10-CV-00623
Case No.: 2:10-CV-01298
OLIN CORPORATION, and PIONEER
AMERICAS, LLC d/b/a OLIN CHLOR
AKALI PRODUCTS,
16
Plaintiffs,
17
v.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
FACTORY MUTUAL INSURANCE
COMPANY, ZURICH AMERICAN
INSURANCE COMPANY, ZURICH
INSURANCE IRELAND, LTD., NATIONAL
UNION FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY of
PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA, and ACE
AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY,
DEFENDANT CONTINENTAL
CASUALTY COMPANY’S MOTION TO
FILE DOCUMENTS UNDER SEAL IN
SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION IN LIMINE
TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF
BURL DANIEL (DKT. #245)
Defendants.
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
OLIN CORPORATION,
Defendant.
Page 1 of 4
1
NOW COMES Defendant Continental Casualty Company (“Continental”), by and
2
through their undersigned attorneys of record, and for its Motion to File Documents Under Seal
3
in Support of its Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Burl Daniel, states as follows:
4
5
6
1. On January 17, 2013, Defendant Continental filed its Motion in Limine to Exclude
Testimony of Burl Daniel (Dkt. #245).
2. Defendant Continental cited three exhibits in conjunction with its motion:
RAINBOW CORPORATE CENTER
b. Exhibit B – Expert Report of Burl Daniel
9
777 NORTH RAINBOW BLVD., STE. 225
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89107
FACSIMILE: 702-384-6025
TELEPHONE: 702-889-6400
a. Exhibit A – Plaintiffs’ Rule 26(a)(2) Expert Disclosure
8
HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC
7
c. Exhibit C – Deposition Transcript of Burl Daniel
10
3. In accordance with the Stipulated Protective Order filed by the Parties (Dkt. #63) and
11
the entered by this Court (Dkt. #65), Defendant Continental respectfully requests that the
12
exhibits cited in Defendant Continental’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Burl Daniel
13
be filed under Seal as Confidential information in accordance with the Stipulated Protective
14
Order filed by the Parties (Dkt. #63) and the entered by this Court (Dkt. #65).
15
Dated this 21st day of January, 2013
16
17
Respectfully submitted,
18
ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
CONTINENTAL CASUALTY COMPANY
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
By:
/s/ Jonquil Whitehead
Jonquil Whitehead
Nevada Bar # 10783
HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC
777 N. Rainbow Blvd., Ste. 225
Las Vegas, NV 89107
/s/ Megan E. Ritenour
Peter E. Kanaris (Pro Hac Vice)
David E. Heiss (Pro Hac Vice)
Megan E. Ritenour (Pro Hac Vice)
FISHER KANARIS, PC
200 South Wacker Drive, 22nd Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60606
28
Page 2 of 4
1
ORDER
2
IT IS SO ORDERED
IT IS SO ORDERED. this 23rd day of January, 2013.
3
4
__________________________________
GLORIA M. NAVARRO
________________________________
United States District Judge
5
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
DATED this ______ day of _____________, 2013.
6
7
8
RAINBOW CORPORATE CENTER
777 NORTH RAINBOW BLVD., STE. 225
LAS VEGAS, NEVADA 89107
FACSIMILE: 702-384-6025
TELEPHONE: 702-889-6400
HALL PRANGLE & SCHOONVELD, LLC
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
...
20
21
22
23
...
24
25
26
27
...
28
Page 3 of 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?