Olin Corporation et al v. Continental Casualty Company et al
Filing
271
ORDER Denying as moot 246 Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of Damages for Bad Faith and of Continentals Net Worth. Denying as moot 244 Motion in Limine to To Exclude Evidence of Any Post-Coverage Position Actions to Support Violations of NRS 686A.310. Denying 224 Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Thomas Jur. Denying 245 Motion in Limine to Exclude the Testimony of Burl Daniel. Denying 247 Motion in Limine. Granting 261 Motion for Leave to File Additional Motions in Limine. Granting 262 Motion in Limine to Exclude the Settlement Agreement. Denying 264 Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony of Former Counsel. Signed by Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/30/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
Olin Corporation; and Pioneer Americas,
LLC d/b/a Olin Chlor Alkali Products,
5
6
7
Plaintiffs,
vs.
Continental Casualty Company,
8
Defendant.
9
10
Continental Casualty Company,
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
15
Olin Corporation,
Defendant.
)
)
)
) Case No.:
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:10-cv-00623-GMN-NJK
2:10-cv-01298-GMN-NJK
ORDER
16
17
Pending before the Court are eight motions in limine filed by the parties. For the
18
reasons discussed in court on January 28, 2013, and at calendar call on January 22, 2013,
19
the Court orders the following:
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence of
21
Damages for Bad Faith and of Continental’s Net Worth (ECF No. 246) and the Motion in
22
Limine to To Exclude Evidence of Any Post-Coverage Position Actions to Support
23
Violations of NRS 686A.310 (ECF No. 244) are DENIED as moot, pursuant to the
24
parties’ representations in court on January 28, 2013, that the parties have reached a
25
settlement as to Counts II and III of Olin’s Complaint, and the motions are therefore
Page 1 of 2
1
2
withdrawn.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion in Limine to Exclude the
3
Testimony of Thomas Jur (ECF No. 224) and the Motion in Limine to Exclude the
4
Testimony of Burl Daniel (ECF No. 245) are DENIED for the reasons discussed by the
5
Court on January 28, 2013.
6
7
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the General Motion in Limine (ECF No. 247)
is DENIED for the reasons stated in Olin’s opposition.
8
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File Additional
9
Motions in Limine (ECF No. 261) is GRANTED pursuant to the parties’ representations
10
in court on January 28, 2013, and is limited to motions in limine filed in the docket
11
before the close of business on January 28, 2013.
12
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion in Limine to Exclude the
13
Settlement Agreement (ECF No. 262) is GRANTED pursuant to the parties’ stipulation
14
and agreement as represented to the Court on January 28, 2013.
15
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion in Limine to Exclude Testimony
16
of Former Counsel (ECF No. 264) is DENIED for the reasons stated in court on January
17
28, 2013.
18
DATED this 30th day of January, 2013.
19
20
_________________________
Gloria M. Navarro
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?