v. Xerox Corporation et al

Filing 54

ORDER Granting 53 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendants Quality Printing, Inc and Leticia Castro. Defendants shall have until 10/8/10 to retain new counsel or file a memorandum explaining why they have not. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence R. Leavitt on 9/3/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)

Xerox Corporation v. Quality Printing, Inc. et al.,

Doc. 54

1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 *** 5 XEROX COROPORATION, 6 7 8 9 10 Defendants. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 LAWRENCE R. LEAVITT UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE For good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that Gordon Silver's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendants Quality Printing, Inc. and Leticia Castro (#53) is granted. Defendants are advised that a corporation may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel. Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194, 202 (1993). Default against a corporation, or dismissal of its claims, is a permissible sanction for its failure to comply with the requirement that it be represented by counsel. United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993). IT IS THEREFORE FURTHER ORDERED that defendants shall have until October 8, 2010 to retain new counsel and file either a notice of appearance of new counsel or a memorandum explaining why they have not retained new counsel. DATED this 3rd day of September, 2010. v. PRINTING AND MAILING SOLUTIONS, INC., et al., Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

2:10-cv-00761-KJD-LRL ORDER

Dockets.Justia.com