Hughes v. Skolnik et al
Filing
16
ORDER Granting 11 Petitioner's Motion to Compel Compliance with 7 Court Order. Respondents shall fully comply with all requirements of the 7 Court's prior order within 21 days. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that 12 Petitioners Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply is GRANTED, such that Petitioner may file a reply 60 days from entry of this order. Replies due by 3/8/2013. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 01/07/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
7
8
9
PHILIP HUGHES,
Petitioner,
10
2:10-cv-00805-KJD-VCF
11
vs.
ORDER
12
13
HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al.,
14
Respondents.
15
16
This represented habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on
17
petitioner’s motion (#11) to compel compliance with Court order and motion (#12) for an
18
extension of time to file a reply.
19
Respondents did not comply with the Court’s order (#7) specifically directing – following
20
a screening review tailored to this particular case – the state court record materials that were
21
to be included with a response in this matter. The supplemental exhibits filed recently
22
continue to fall far short of compliance with the order. In the response to petitioner’s motion,
23
as well as in the notice filed with the supplemental exhibits, counsel continues to simply
24
disregard the Court’s prior order.
25
An order such as in this case detailing the specific record materials that the Court finds
26
relevant to adjudication of the case follows upon a case-specific screening review.
27
Regardless of whether counsel agrees with the Court’s assessment, simply disregarding the
28
Court’s order is not an option.
1
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (#11) to compel compliance
2
with Court order is GRANTED and that, within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order,
3
respondents shall fully comply with all requirements of the Court’s prior order (#7). No
4
extensions of time will be granted to comply with the Court’s orders, as respondents have had
5
ample time previously to comply.
6
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (#12) to extend time is GRANTED,
7
such that petitioner may file a reply sixty (60) days from entry of this order. If respondents
8
fail to timely and fully comply with the Court’s orders, petitioner may seek an extension of time
9
as necessary to the situation.
10
DATED: January 7, 2013
11
12
13
________________________________
KENT J. DAWSON
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?