Hughes v. Skolnik et al

Filing 16

ORDER Granting 11 Petitioner's Motion to Compel Compliance with 7 Court Order. Respondents shall fully comply with all requirements of the 7 Court's prior order within 21 days. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that 12 Petitioners Motion to Extend Time to File a Reply is GRANTED, such that Petitioner may file a reply 60 days from entry of this order. Replies due by 3/8/2013. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 01/07/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 9 PHILIP HUGHES, Petitioner, 10 2:10-cv-00805-KJD-VCF 11 vs. ORDER 12 13 HOWARD SKOLNIK, et al., 14 Respondents. 15 16 This represented habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on 17 petitioner’s motion (#11) to compel compliance with Court order and motion (#12) for an 18 extension of time to file a reply. 19 Respondents did not comply with the Court’s order (#7) specifically directing – following 20 a screening review tailored to this particular case – the state court record materials that were 21 to be included with a response in this matter. The supplemental exhibits filed recently 22 continue to fall far short of compliance with the order. In the response to petitioner’s motion, 23 as well as in the notice filed with the supplemental exhibits, counsel continues to simply 24 disregard the Court’s prior order. 25 An order such as in this case detailing the specific record materials that the Court finds 26 relevant to adjudication of the case follows upon a case-specific screening review. 27 Regardless of whether counsel agrees with the Court’s assessment, simply disregarding the 28 Court’s order is not an option. 1 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (#11) to compel compliance 2 with Court order is GRANTED and that, within twenty-one (21) days of entry of this order, 3 respondents shall fully comply with all requirements of the Court’s prior order (#7). No 4 extensions of time will be granted to comply with the Court’s orders, as respondents have had 5 ample time previously to comply. 6 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (#12) to extend time is GRANTED, 7 such that petitioner may file a reply sixty (60) days from entry of this order. If respondents 8 fail to timely and fully comply with the Court’s orders, petitioner may seek an extension of time 9 as necessary to the situation. 10 DATED: January 7, 2013 11 12 13 ________________________________ KENT J. DAWSON United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?