Irish et al v. Irish et al
Filing
24
ORDER Denying 23 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
LORI IRISH, et al.,
9
10
11
12
13
2:10-CV-892 JCM (PAL)
Plaintiffs,
v.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS
BOARD, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
16
17
ORDER
Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion for this court to reconsider its prior order
dismissing the case and denying plaintiff leave to amend. (Doc. #23).
18
Motions for reconsideration “should not be granted, absent highly unusual circumstances.”
19
Kona Enters., Inc. v. Estate of Bishop, 229 F.3d 877, 890 (9th Cir. 2000). These circumstances are
20
present where “the district court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error,
21
or if there is an intervening change in the controlling law.” Id. Plaintiffs’ motion fails to persuade
22
this court that any of these circumstances exist in the present case.
23
Plaintiff contends that she was unaware of the local requirement that her motion seeking
24
leave to amend be accompanied by the proposed, amended complaint. See Local Rule 15-1(a). She
25
has since provided the court with a copy of the proposed amended complaint. The proposed,
26
amended complaint does not materially differ from the original complaint such that Magistrate Judge
27
Leen’s screening order is not equally applicable to the proposed, amended complaint. As such, the
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
1
proposed amendments are futile, and denial of the instant motion is appropriate. See Foman v.
2
Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962) (explaining that leave to amend should be denied where the
3
amendments are futile).
4
Accordingly,
5
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED, that plaintiff’s motion for
6
7
reconsideration (doc. #23) be, and the same hereby is, DENIED.
DATED March 19, 2012.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
James C. Mahan
U.S. District Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?