Malloy et al v. SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.
Filing
34
ORDER Overruling 26 Objection to 24 Order. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 4/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
9
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
10
***
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
In re-estate of EDGAR H. MALLOY, EDGAR
W. MALLOY, as Sole Administrator of
EDGAR H. MALLOY Estate; EDGAR W.
MALLOY, as heir to the Estate of EDGAR H.
MALLOY,
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a
)
business entity, ROE EMPLOYEE, ROE
)
INDIVIDUALS I through X, and DOE
)
CORPORATIONS and other business entities I )
through X, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________)
Case No.: 2:10-cv-00908-RLH-LRL
ORDER
(Motion for District Judge to
Reconsider–#26)
20
21
Before the Court is an Order (#24) entered by the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt,
22
Magistrate Judge, regarding Defendant SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.’s (“SPX”) Motion to
23
Strike (#17) and Plaintiff Edgar W. Malloy’s Motion to Extend Time (#18).
24
25
SPX filed Objections to Magistrate Judge Leavitt’s Order (#26) in accordance with
Rule IB 3-1 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)
1
1
Nevada. Malloy filed a Response (#28) to the Objections, and this matter was referred for
2
consideration.
3
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in accordance with 28
4
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order (#24) is
5
not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed.
6
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leavitt’s Order (#24) is
7
AFFIRMED, SPX’s Objections are overruled, SPX’s Motion Strike (#17) is DENIED, and
8
Malloy’s Motion to Extend (#18) is GRANTED..
9
Dated: April 14, 2011.
10
11
____________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
Chief United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
AO 72
(Rev. 8/82)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?