Malloy et al v. SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER Overruling 26 Objection to 24 Order. Signed by Chief Judge Roger L. Hunt on 4/14/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 10 *** 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 In re-estate of EDGAR H. MALLOY, EDGAR W. MALLOY, as Sole Administrator of EDGAR H. MALLOY Estate; EDGAR W. MALLOY, as heir to the Estate of EDGAR H. MALLOY, ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) SPX COOLING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a ) business entity, ROE EMPLOYEE, ROE ) INDIVIDUALS I through X, and DOE ) CORPORATIONS and other business entities I ) through X, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) _______________________________________) Case No.: 2:10-cv-00908-RLH-LRL ORDER (Motion for District Judge to Reconsider–#26) 20 21 Before the Court is an Order (#24) entered by the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt, 22 Magistrate Judge, regarding Defendant SPX Cooling Technologies, Inc.’s (“SPX”) Motion to 23 Strike (#17) and Plaintiff Edgar W. Malloy’s Motion to Extend Time (#18). 24 25 SPX filed Objections to Magistrate Judge Leavitt’s Order (#26) in accordance with Rule IB 3-1 of the Local Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 1 1 Nevada. Malloy filed a Response (#28) to the Objections, and this matter was referred for 2 consideration. 3 The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in accordance with 28 4 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order (#24) is 5 not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed. 6 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leavitt’s Order (#24) is 7 AFFIRMED, SPX’s Objections are overruled, SPX’s Motion Strike (#17) is DENIED, and 8 Malloy’s Motion to Extend (#18) is GRANTED.. 9 Dated: April 14, 2011. 10 11 ____________________________________ ROGER L. HUNT Chief United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 AO 72 (Rev. 8/82) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?