Vallecillos v. Ann Taylor Store #2080
Filing
10
ORDER Affirming 9 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff Sonia Vallecillos' case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 7/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
9
10
11
***
)
)
SONIA VALLECILLOS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
ANN TAYLOR STORE #2080, et al., )
)
)
Defendants.
)
2:10-CV-00910-PMP-LRL
ORDER
12
13
Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff Sonia Vallecillos’
14
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Complaint (Doc. #2), filed on June
15
14, 2010. On June 20, 2011, the Honorable Lawrence R. Leavitt United States
16
Magistrate Judge, entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. #9) recommending
17
that Plaintiff’s case be dismissed with prejudice.
18
On August 23, 2010, Plaintiff Vallecillos was given instructions to file an
19
Amended Complaint to cure the deficiencies and to pay the filing fee not later than
20
September 22, 2010, or her case would be dismissed. On September 20, 2010,
21
Plaintiff paid the $350 filing fee, but she did not file an Amended Complaint.
On March 3, 2011, the Court issued an Order (Doc. #8) directing Plaintiff
22
23
to file an Amended Complaint by April 4, 2011, or her case would be dismissed. To
24
date, Plaintiff has not complied with this Order (Doc. #8).
25
///
26
///
1
The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in
2
accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 1-4 and determines that
3
Magistrate Judge Leavitt’s Report and Recommendation should be Affirmed.
4
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leavitt’s Report
5
and Recommendation (Doc. #9) is Affirmed and Plaintiff Sonia Vallecillos’ case is
6
DISMISSED with prejudice.
7
8
DATED: July 11, 2011.
9
10
11
PHILIP M. PRO
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?