Brown v. Kaplan College

Filing 13

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Leens Report of Findings and Recommendation 10 is Affirmed and Plaintiff Kirsha Browns Complaint 1 is DISMISSED with prejudice. Plaintiff Browns Motion to Extend Time to Amend Complaint 11 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 8/27/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA -oOoKIRSHA BROWN, Plaintiff, vs. KAPLAN COLLEGE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2 :10-CV-00913-PMP-PAL ORDER

Before the Court for consideration is Plaintiff Kirsha Brown's Complaint (Doc. #1), filed on June 14, 2010. On July 30, 2010, the Honorable Peggy A. Leen United States Magistrate Judge, entered a Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #10) recommending that Plaintiff Brown's Complaint (Doc. #1) be denied. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 3-2(a) and determines that Magistrate Judge Leen's Report of Findings and Recommendation should be Affirmed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Leen's Report of Findings and Recommendation (Doc. #10) is Affirmed and Plaintiff Kirsha Brown's Complaint (Doc. #1) is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Brown's Motion to Extend Time to Amend Complaint (Doc. #11) is DENIED. DATED: August 27, 2010. PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge