Righthaven LLC v. Thomas

Filing 8

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Voluntary Dismissal 7 . This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 8/3/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
Righthaven LLC v. Thomas Doc. 8 Case 2:10-cv-01026-HDM-RJJ Document 7 Filed 08/03/10 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6656 sgibson@righthaven.com J. CHARLES COONS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10553 ccoons@righthaven.com Righthaven LLC 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 (702) 527-5900 Attorneys for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Plaintiff, v. JOHN THOMAS, an individual, Defendant. Case No.: 2:10-cv-01026-HDM-RJJ VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE ORDER on Righthaven LLC ("Righthaven") filed a Complaint (Docket No.: 1) on Friday, June 25, 2010 for copyright infringement against John Thomas ("Mr. Thomas"). Righthaven and Mr. Thomas have agreed to settle the matter by a written agreement. Therefore, Righthaven hereby voluntarily dismisses this action with prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(a)(1)(A)(i). 1 Dockets.Justia.com Case 2:10-cv-01026-HDM-RJJ Document 7 Filed 08/03/10 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated this third day of August, 2010. RIGHTHAVEN LLC By: /s/ J. Charles Coons STEVEN A. GIBSON, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6656 J. CHARLES COONS, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 10553 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER Pursuant to plaintiff Righthaven LLC's Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice (#7), this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. It is so ordered. Dated: August 3, 2010 ____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?