Righthaven LLC v. Realty One Group, Inc. et al

Filing 20

ORDER Granting 19 Request for Substitution of Counsel for Righthaven LLC. Attorney Shawn A. Mangano added and Steven A. Gibson terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 11/18/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
-PAL Righthaven LLC v. Realty One Group, Inc. et al Doc. 20 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 _________________________________________ PEGGY A. LEEN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE This matter is before the court on a Substitution of Attorneys (Dkt. #19) filed November 12, 2010. It seeks to substitute Shawn A. Mangano in the place and stead of Steven A. Gibson as attorney for Plaintiff Righthaven LLC in this matter. LR IA 10-6(c) requires that any stipulation to substitute attorneys shall be by leave of court and shall bear the signature of the attorneys and the client represented. It provides that the signature of an attorney to substitute into a case "constitutes an express acceptance of all dates then set for pretrial proceedings, for trial or hearing, by the discovery plan, or in any court order." LR IA 10-6(d) also provides that the substitution of an attorney "shall not alone be reason for delay of pretrial proceedings, discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case." All other counsel for Righthaven shall continue representation. The Complaint (Dkt. #1) was filed on June 25, 2010. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's request to substitute Shawn A. Mangano in the place and stead of Steven A. Gibson is GRANTED, subject to the provisions of LR IA 10-6(c) and (d). Dated this 18th day of November, 2010. RIGHTHAVEN LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) REALTY ONE GROUP, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Case No. 2:10-cv-01036-LRH-PAL ORDER (Substitution of Counsel - Dkt. #19) Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?