Villegas et al v. Slaght et al

Filing 42

ORDER that Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 37 is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs claim for loss of past income. Defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 37 with respect to Plaintiffs claim for loss of future income is DENIED without prejudice to renew the same following the completion of discovery in this case. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 4/28/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 *** ) RICHARD VILLEGAS, individually, ) JESSIE VILLEGAS, individually, and ) ) as husband and wife, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) LYLE SLAGHT, individually, DEBOER TRANSPORTATION, INC., ) ) a Wisconsin Corporation, ) ) Defendants. ) 2:10-CV-01051-PMP-LRL ORDER 12 The Court having read and considered Defendants’ Motion for Partial 13 14 Summary Judgment (Doc. #37) filed on March 4, 2011, regarding loss of past and 15 future income, Plaintiffs’ Response thereto (Doc. #38) filed March 28, 2011, and 16 Defendants’ Reply (Doc. #40) filed April 13, 2011, and good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 17 18 (Doc. #37) is GRANTED with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim for loss of “past 19 income.” 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Partial 21 Summary Judgment (Doc. #37) with respect to Plaintiffs’ claim for loss of “future 22 income” is DENIED without prejudice to renew the same following the completion 23 of discovery in this case. 24 DATED: April 28, 2011. 25 26 PHILIP M. PRO United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?