Willoughby v. Leen

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/12/2010. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SD)

Download PDF
Willoughby v. Leen Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 ERIC LAMONT WILLOUGHBY, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 On July 1, 2010, plaintiff submitted a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (docket # 1). On September 21, 2010, the court issued an order dismissing plaintiff's complaint with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty (30) days of entry of the order (docket #3), which was served on plaintiff at his address of record. On September 29, 2010, that order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. Pursuant to Rule 2-2 of the Local Rules of Special Proceedings and Appeals, a pro se litigant is required to keep the court apprised of his or her current address at all times. Local Rule 2-2 states: "The plaintiff shall immediately file with the court written notification of any change of address. The notification must include proof of service upon each opposing party or the party's attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in dismissal of the action with prejudice." Accordingly, as plaintiff has failed to file written notification of change of address with the court, this vs. PEGGY LEEN, Defendant. Plaintiff, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:10-cv-01089-KJD-LRL ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 action is dismissed. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. DATED: October 12, 2010 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?