Rean v. City Of Las Vegas et al

Filing 84

ORDER that Magistrate Judge Johnstons Order 76 is AFFIRMED, Plaintiffs Objection 77 is overruled, and Plaintiffs Motion to Appointment of Counsel 73 is denied. Signed by Judge Roger L. Hunt on 10/11/11. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6

***

7
8
9
10
11

ROBERT RAYMOND REAN,

)
)
Plaintiff(s),
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, et al.,
)
)
Defendant(s).
)
____________________________________)

2:10-cv-1094-RLH-RJJ
ORDER

12
13
14
15

Before the Court is an Order (#76) entered by the Honorable Robert J. Johnston
regarding Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (#73).
Plaintiff filed an Objection to Judge Johnston’s Order (#77) in accordance with Local

16

Rule IB 3-1 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada, and

17

this matter was referred for consideration.

18

The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record in this case in accordance with

19

28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), (B), and (C) and Local Rule IB 3-1 and determines that the Order of

20

Magistrate Judge Johnston is not clearly erroneous or contrary to law and should be affirmed.

21

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Johnston’s Order (#76) is

22

AFFIRMED, Plaintiff’s Objection (#77) is overruled, and Plaintiff’s Motion to Appointment of

23

Counsel (#73) is denied.

24

Dated: October 11, 2011.

25
26

_________________________________
ROGER L. HUNT
U.S. District Judge