Wilson v. Republic Services Of Southern Nevada
Filing
53
ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Amend Caption. ORDERED that the clerk shall amend the caption in this action to read as follows: Eddie D. Wilson v. Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., d.b.a. Republic Services of Southern Nevada. FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Republic's Request to Strike Plaintiff's Emergency Motion to Amend (contained within 51 ) is GRANTED. THEREFORE ORDERED that 49 Motion to Amend Caption is STRICKEN. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
EDDIE D. WILSON,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
8
9
REPUBLIC SERVICES OF SOUTHERN
NEVADA,
Defendant.
***
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:10-cv-01156-KJD -VCF
ORDER
10
Before the court is pro se plaintiff Eddie D. Wilson’s Motion To Amend Caption. (#42).
11
Defendant Republic Services of Southern Nevada (hereinafter “Republic”) filed an Opposition (#45),
12
and plaintiff filed a Reply (#46). Also before the court is plaintiff Wilson’s Emergency Motion To
13
Amend Caption. (#49). Defendant Republic filed an Opposition. (#51).
14
Background/Argument
15
On September 9, 2010, plaintiff filed his complaint against Republic asserting claims for
16
discrimination and retaliation. (#4). On February 22, 2011, defendant Republic filed a motion to
17
dismiss (#12), which the court granted in part and denied in part on August 1, 2011 (#25). On August
18
15, 2011, defendant Republic filed its answer. (#27). Plaintiff filed a motion to amend caption on
19
February 17, 2012. (#42). In the motion, plaintiff asks this court to permit him to add Republic Silver
20
State Disposal, Inc. as a defendant. Id. In response, defendant Republic asserts that it is the only proper
21
defendant, as Republic Services of Southern Nevada is the entity that previously employed plaintiff.
22
(#45). Defendant Republic also asserts that it “consents to an amendment of the caption to include
23
“Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., d.b.a. Republic Services of Southern Nevada.” Id. In plaintiff’s
24
reply, he agrees that the caption should be amended as consented to by the defendant. (#46).
25
On May 3, 2012, plaintiff filed an emergency motion to amend caption, asking this court to
26
1
amend the caption as defendant Republic consented to. (#49). Defendant Republic filed an opposition,
2
asking this court to strike plaintiff’s motion (#49) as duplicative of the plaintiff’s previously filed
3
motion to amend caption (#42). (#51). On May 22, 2012, the pending motions to amend caption (#42
4
and #49) were referred to the undersigned magistrate judge.
5
Discussion
6
As plaintiff Wilson and defendant Republic agree to an amendment of the caption to read “Eddie
7
D. Wilson v. Republic Silver State Disposal, Inc., d.b.a. Republic Services of Southern Nevada,” the
8
court finds that amending the caption accordingly is appropriate. The court also finds that striking
9
plaintiff’s emergency motion to amend (#49) is warranted, as the motion is duplicative of plaintiff’s
10
previous motion to amend caption (#42).
11
Accordingly, and for good cause shown,
12
IT IS ORDERED that pro se plaintiff Eddie D. Wilson’s Motion To Amend Caption (#42) is
13
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, as discussed above.
14
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the clerk shall amend the caption in this action to read as
15
follows: “EDDIE D. WILSON v. REPUBLIC SILVER STATE DISPOSAL, INC., d.b.a. REPUBLIC
16
SERVICES OF SOUTHERN NEVADA”
17
18
19
20
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant Republic’s Request To Strike Plaintiff’s Emergency
Motion To Amend (#51) is GRANTED.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff Wilson’s Emergency Motion To Amend Caption
(#49) is hereby STRICKEN.
DATED this 30th day of May, 2012.
22
23
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?