Plasma Arc Technologies, Inc. v. Voorhes et al

Filing 5

ORDER DISMISSING CASE for failure to serve Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m). Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/14/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)

Plasma Arc Technologies, Inc. v. Voorhes et al

Doc. 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiff's complaint was filed on July 15, 2010. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires service of summons and complaint to be made upon a defendant 120 days after the filing of the complaint. The 120 day time period for effecting service of the summons and complaint upon Defendants expired no later than November 12, 2010. On November 15, 2010, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file proof of service of the summons and complaint no later than November 30, 2010, and warned Plaintiff that failure to do so would result in the complaint against Defendants being dismissed without prejudice. //// //// //// v. JOHN VOORHES, et al., Defendants. PLASMA ARC TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-CV-01176-KJD-LRL ORDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26

Plaintiff has failed to file proof of service on Defendants, or to otherwise respond to the Court's order. Therefore, the Court dismisses Plaintiff's complaint without prejudice against Defendants for failure to serve Defendants in compliance with Rule 4(m). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 14th day of December 2010.

_____________________________ Kent J. Dawson United States District Judge

2