Ritter v. Shepro et al

Filing 26

ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice. 6 Motion to Dismiss is Granted, 8 Motion for Attorney's Fees is Denied, 9 & 25 Motions to Expunge Lis Pendens are Granted. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/21/10. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)

Download PDF
Ritter v. Shepro et al Doc. 26 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The defendants move to dismiss plaintiff Sherry D. Ritter's complaint (#6), for expungement of a lis pendens she filed against certain property (## 9, 25), and for attorney's fees. As Ritter is proceeding pro se, the Court notified her of the requirements in opposing the motion to dismiss (#7). Ritter did not file an opposition, indicating her consent to the granting of the motions. Accordingly, for good cause shown, THE COURT ORDERS that Defendants' Motions to Expunge Lis Pendens (## 9, 25) are GRANTED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDER that the Lis Pendens recorded by the plaintiff regarding the property located at 1704 Navajo Lake Way, Las Vegas, NV 89128, (APN: 138-22-413-058), which Lis Pendens is recorded as Instrument No. 201007290004441 in v. BILL SHEPRO, et al., Defendants. SHERRY D. RITTER, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:10-cv-1207-LDG (LRL) ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 the Office of the Clark County Recorder on January 7, 2009, is CANCELLED and EXPUNGED. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that a copy of this Order may be recorded by the Clark County Recorder in the applicable chain of title. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (#6) is GRANTED; This matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Defendants' Motion for Attorney's Fees (#8) is DENIED. DATED this ______ day of September, 2010. Lloyd D. George United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?