Prator v. Neven et al

Filing 20

ORDER Denying 16 Motion for the submission of the original cassette tape and 18 Motion for Order to Show Cause. Respondents SHALL submit the recording of petitioners March 1, 2009 disciplinary hearing on compact disc to the court within thirty 30 days of the date of this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 3/7/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 TYRONE PRATOR, 12 Petitioner, 13 vs. 14 DWIGHT NEVEN, et al., 15 Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) / 2:10-cv-01209-JCM-VCF ORDER 16 17 18 This is a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 in which petitioner, a state prisoner, is proceeding pro se. 19 Petitioner moves the court to require respondents to produce the original cassette tape 20 recording from his disciplinary hearing. (ECF Nos. 16, 18.) Petitioner states that he is concerned 21 that the digital compact disc with the recording could be altered and that the transcript of the hearing 22 is inaccurate. 23 Respondents state that both a compact disc and a transcript were submitted to the 24 state district court but that only the transcript has been submitted to this court. Respondents argue 25 that petitioner waived any objection to the admission of the transcript or the compact disc because he 26 did not raise them in state court. 1 The court will require respondents to submit the compact disc recording of 2 petitioner’s disciplinary hearing held March 1, 2009. Petitioner’s concerns regarding the authenticity 3 of the recording, as captured on the compact disc, lack sufficient particularity to prompt this court to 4 require respondents to submit the original cassette tape at this time. 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for the submission of the 6 original cassette tape (ECF No. 16) and motion for admission and/or order to show cause (ECF No. 7 19) are DENIED. 8 9 10 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondents SHALL submit the recording of petitioner’s March 1, 2009 disciplinary hearing on compact disc to the court within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 11 12 13 DATED March 7, 2012. ____________________, 2012. this _____ day of 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?