Evans v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
94
ORDER granting Plaintiff's ECF No. 93 Motion to Vacate the 9/15/2017 Status Conference; directing Plaintiff to file a Notice of Decision within 7 days after the Nevada Supreme Court's ruling in Neville v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Nev. Sup. Ct. No. 70696. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 9/12/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Mark R. Thierman, Esq. (Nev. Bar No. 8285)
mark@thiermanbuck.com
Joshua D. Buck, Esq. (Nev. Bar No. 12187)
josh@thiermanbuck.com
Leah L. Jones, Esq. (Nev. Bar No. 13161)
leah@thiermanbuck.com
THIERMAN BUCK, LLP
7287 Lakeside Drive
Reno, Nevada 89511
Telephone: (775) 284-1500
Fax: (775) 703-5027
11
David R. Markham, CA. Bar No. 071814 (pro hac vice)
dmarkham@markham-law.com
Janine R. Menhennet, CA. Bar No. 163501 (pro hac vice)
jmenhennet@markham-law.com
THE MARKHAM LAW FIRM
750 B Street, Suite 1950
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 399-3995
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7
8
9
10
13
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA
16
17
CHARDE EVANS, on behalf of herself, and all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
22
23
v.
WAL-MART STORES, INC., and DOES 1
through 50, Inclusive,
Case No. 2:10-cv-01224-JCM-VCF
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE
STATUS CONFERENCE SET FOR
SEPTEMBER 15, 2017
Date: September 15, 2017
Time: 10:00 a.m.
Judge: Magistrate Ferenbach
Defendants.
Judge:
Hon. James C. Mahan
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE
1
Plaintiff respectfully requests that this Court vacate the Status Conference scheduled
2
for September 15, 2017 at 10:00 a.m. because the Nevada Supreme Court has yet to issue its
3
decision in Neville v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Nev. Sup. Ct. No.
4
70696.
5
Dated: September 11, 2017
Respectfully submitted:
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
6
7
By: s/Joshua D. Buck
Joshua D. Buck
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class
8
9
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
10
11
This Court granted Wal-Mart’s motion to stay the case pending the Nevada Supreme
12
Court’s decision in Neville v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Nev. Sup.
13
Ct. No. 70696 (“Neville”). See ECF No. 91.
14
Counsel for Plaintiff is also counsel for Petitioner in the Neville action.1 The Nevada
15
Supreme Court heard oral argument on Neville’s Petition on July 17, 2017.2 As of the date of
16
filing this Motion, the Nevada Supreme Court has not issued its decision in Neville. Counsel
17
for Plaintiff expects a decision in Neville in the next few months. Upon issuance of a decision
18
in Neville, Counsel for Plaintiff will provide this court with a Notice of Decision no later than
19
seven (7) days after the issuance of the decision by the Nevada Supreme Court.
20
Dated: September 11, 2017
Respectfully submitted:
THIERMAN BUCK LLP
21
22
By: s/Joshua D. Buck
Joshua D. Buck
Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Class
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
The Neville docket can be found at:
http://caseinfo.nvsupremecourt.us/public/caseView.do;jsessionid=02F070F991ECE4DADD45
07D238D0986D?csIID=39913 (last visited Aug. 16, 2017).
2
An audio transcript of the oral argument in Neville can be found at:
http://nvcourts.gov/Supreme/Arguments/Recordings/NEVILLE,_JR__VS__DISTRICT_COU
RT_(TERRIBLE_HERBST,_INC_)/ (last visited Aug. 16, 2017).
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE
1
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Plaintiff’s Motion to Vacate the September 15, 2017 Status Conference is GRANTED.
3
Plaintiff shall file a Notice of Decision within seven (7) days after the Nevada Supreme
4
Court’s ruling in Neville v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, Nev. Sup. Ct.
5
No. 70696.
6
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
September 12
DATED: ______________, 2017
_________________________________________
CAM FERENBACH
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO VACATE STATUS CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?