Righthaven LLC v. Center For Intercultural Organizing et al

Filing 51

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Plaintiff Righthaven LLC. (Mangano, Shawn)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 SHAWN A. MANGANO, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 6730 shawn@manganolaw.com SHAWN A. MANGANO, LTD. 9960 West Cheyenne Avenue, Suite 170 Las Vegas, Nevada 89129-7701 Tel: (702) 304-0432 Fax: (702) 922-3851 Attorney for Plaintiff 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 10 11 RIGHTHAVEN LLC, a Nevada limitedliability company, Case No.: 2:10-cv-01322-JCM-LRL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 16 CENTER FOR INTERCULTURAL ORGANIZING, a not-for-profit Oregon entity; and KAYSE JAMA, an individual, Defendants. 17 18 19 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5(b) and in compliance with Judge Roger L. 20 Hunt’s Minute Order (Doc. 138), in the matter of Righthaven v. Democratic Underground, 2:10- 21 cv-1356-RLH-GWF, I hereby certify that on this 5th day of August, 2011, I caused the following 22 documents to be served: 23 24 25 26 27 1. The Strategic Alliance Agreement between Righthaven LLC and Stephens Media LLC; 2. The Order on the Motion for Voluntary Dismissal with Prejudice; Motion to Dismiss or Strike; and the Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 116); and 3. The Transcript of the Order to Show Cause Hearing, dated July 14, 2011. 28 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 The foregoing documents were served via electronic mail as follows: Center for Intercultural Organizing c/o James R. Olson, Esq. chartle@ocgd.com Center for Intercultural Organizing c/o Michael Stoberski, Esq. mstoberski@ocgd.com Kayse Jama c/o James R. Olson, Esq. chartle@ocgd.com Kayse Jama c/o Michael Stoberski, Esq. mstoberski@ocgd.com Professor Jason Schultz c/o Chad A. Bowers, Esq. chadbowers@lawyer.com 14 15 16 By: Steven G. Ganim Steven G. Ganim An employee of Righthaven LLC 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?